Site icon LoupedIn

Who controls your opt-out?

The impact of the UPC on existing and future commercial arrangements

As the commencement of the Unified Patents Court looms larger, we are turning our thoughts to some of the really practical issues which need to be addressed with a degree of urgency now. We will be looking at the question of “opting out” of the UPC jurisdiction in a sequence of blog posts to follow, but we thought we would start by looking at some of the non-contentious issues which can arise as a result of the coming of the UPC and the Unitary Patent.

More than six years ago this firm published an article in Managing Intellectual Property entitled “The Unitary Patent for non-litigators“.  One of the points we made then was the need for companies who enter into commercial arrangements relating to patents (licences, security etc.) to carefully consider the impact of the UPC opt-out on their existing arrangements.  In particular, we noted that:

Whilst the UPC was effectively placed on hiatus (following the Brexit vote in the UK and constitutional challenges in Germany) companies could be forgiven for not taking steps to address these matters.  Certainly our experience is that very few companies have done so.  However, with the period for opting out expected to commence at some point in the first half of next year, the time available for these discussions to take place is now very limited and there is considerable scope for disagreement if perspectives on the opt out differ.  

Michael Carter is a principal associate in our award winning intellectual property team, with particular experience of enforcing a broad range of intellectual property rights. Having spent time on secondment at two leading automotive brands, he understands the challenges involved in building and maintaining a strong brand identity, and protecting the intellectual property rights in the technology which underpins the business.

Exit mobile version