• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
  • Gowling WLG
  • Legal information
  • Privacy statement
  • Cookie Policy
  • Home
  • About
  • Posts
  • Blogs
    • B2022
    • The IP Blog
    • Public Law & Regulation
    • AI
    • The UPC Blog

LoupedIn

Liar Liar, CV on fire? – The Week in HR

Published on September 23, 2016 by Ian Chapman-Curry

Liar Liar, CV on fire? – The Week in HR

When does a boast become a lie? When does bragging become dishonesty?

In applying for a coveted job, applicants may give the impression that they were more involved in or responsible for a successful project. How do you tell the point at which this becomes so divorced from reality that it is fraudulent?

It seems that in today’s increasingly cut-throat job market applicants are overstepping the mark and their lies are causing both financial loss and reputational damage to employers.

A recent survey carried out by AXELOS reported that, in the last three years, almost 100,000 candidates have lied about their qualifications on application forms. Of greater concern for the readership of this blog, 14% of HR professionals have had to deal with at least five cases of underqualified employees being found out.

The survey shows that the two biggest concerns for employers of hiring under-qualified staff are poor performance and the risk of reputational damage. I would add in a third – dishonesty.

Not only that, but over 40% of companies have reportedly spent £10,000 on rehiring staff after discovering that they have employed someone who was not properly qualified for the position. Even more galling for HR, 9% of companies surveyed had been forced to spend a whopping £40,000 or more on finding new recruits.

In spite of the costly risks of hiring under-qualified candidates, the survey shows an alarmingly low number of HR professionals (48%) actually verify an applicant’s qualifications before offering them an employment contract.

What happens to candidates who are found out? 54% of HR professionals said that they would dismiss a culprit that outright lied. However, employees are less likely to be dismissed for just exaggerating, with only 37% of HR professionals saying that they would dismiss the individual.

If the majority of HR teams are prepared to dismiss an individual for lying about their qualifications, surely the validity of a candidate’s professed qualifications on their application form should subject to more thorough screening?

Working forward for women

An alliance headed up by Barclays, BT Group, Ford, John Lewis Partnership, and Transport for London amongst others is working to abolish workplace discrimination against pregnant women and new mothers. Despite claims to have improved, some companies are guilty of chronic inaction. In spite of 84% of British businesses claiming to support pregnant women and women on maternity leave, 77% of these women have had a negative or discriminatory experience in the workplace.

Added to that, a Mumsnet survey uncovered that 33.3% of employers have overheard those in charge of recruitment making comments about the extra hassle involved in employing a woman.The “Working Forward” alliance aims to tackle the issue by training employers in how to attract, develop and retain women at work. Suggestions include the introduction of a senior gender equality champion at board level and the advertisement of all job vacancies as being open to flexible working.

Companies that publicly pledge the alliance will receive invaluable knowledge, experience and best practice advice from the founding members.

The message is clear. Businesses need to do the right thing and commit to change, all the while plugging those skills gaps and gaining that competitive edge.

The less loyal millennials

In today’s job market, millennials are considered to be ‘flight risks’, always keeping an eye out for the next best thing. But with not much chance of getting on the property ladder any time soon and interest rates being so low that their savings amount to little, why would we expect them to do anything but look for a better-paid position?

For smaller employer organisations in particular, it is hard not to be disheartened when you invest time and money in training up employees that, in no time, leave for a job which they perceive to be better.

So how do we get those Gen Y workers with itchy feet to stay put? In spite of the younger generation’s financial pressures, the main reason for millennials walking away from their jobs is that they do not feel sufficiently motivated and rewarded by their bosses .It is now more important than ever for companies to ensure that they have inspirational leaders at the helm ensuring the retention of these young job hoppers.

About the author(s)

Photo of Ian Chapman-Curry
Ian Chapman-Curry
See recent posts

Ian is a London-based professional support lawyer (PSL) legal director. Ian is a member of our pensions and combined human resource solutions (CHRS) teams. He works with clients to solve their employment and pensions law issues. Ian maintains a particular focus on 'crossover' issues that benefit from his understanding of both areas of law.

  • Ian Chapman-Curry
    https://loupedin.blog/author/ianchapmancurry/
    The Victorian workhouse revisited - The Week in HR
  • Ian Chapman-Curry
    https://loupedin.blog/author/ianchapmancurry/
    Keeping the purse strings tight - The Week in HR
  • Ian Chapman-Curry
    https://loupedin.blog/author/ianchapmancurry/
    Get on your bike - The Week in HR
  • Ian Chapman-Curry
    https://loupedin.blog/author/ianchapmancurry/
    Return of the boomerang employee - The Week in HR

Ian Chapman-Curry

Ian is a London-based professional support lawyer (PSL) legal director. Ian is a member of our pensions and combined human resource solutions (CHRS) teams. He works with clients to solve their employment and pensions law issues. Ian maintains a particular focus on 'crossover' issues that benefit from his understanding of both areas of law.

Filed Under: Opinion Tagged With: Week in HR

Views expressed in this blog do not necessarily reflect those of Gowling WLG.

NOT LEGAL ADVICE. Information made available on this website in any form is for information purposes only. It is not, and should not be taken as, legal advice. You should not rely on, or take or fail to take any action based upon this information. Never disregard professional legal advice or delay in seeking legal advice because of something you have read on this website. Gowling WLG professionals will be pleased to discuss resolutions to specific legal concerns you may have.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Climate change – New report highlights areas for scaling up action
  • Transferring data out of China? Understand the key points from the Chinese Standard Contractual Clauses
  • Getting ready for pensions dashboards

Tags

apprenticeships (5) Artificial Intelligence (AI) (52) Autonomous vehicles (11) b2022 (18) Birmingham 2022 (8) Birmingham 2022 Commonwealth Games (14) brand protection (5) Brexit (23) china (5) Climate change (13) COP26 (11) COP27 (6) Copyright (8) COVID-19 (23) Cyber security (5) Data protection (6) Employment (13) employment law (9) Environment (8) ESG (21) ESG and pensions (9) financial services (5) Intellectual Property (59) IP (9) Life sciences (6) net zero (6) Patents (28) Pensions (41) Pension scams (5) Pension Schemes Act 2021 (11) Pensions dashboards (7) Pensions in 2022 (10) Pensions law (31) Procurement (7) Public Law & Regulation (39) Real Estate (16) Retail (6) sustainability (7) Tech (45) The Week In Pensions (11) Trademarks (13) UK (15) unified patents court (9) UPC (24) Week in HR (8)

Categories

Archives

Gowling WLG is an international law firm comprising the members of Gowling WLG International Limited, an English Company Limited by Guarantee, and their respective affiliates. Each member and affiliate is an autonomous and independent entity. Gowling WLG International Limited promotes, facilitates and co-ordinates the activities of its members but does not itself provide services to clients. Our structure is explained in more detail on our Legal Information page.

Footer

LoupedIn is the Official Gowling WLG Blog. Gowling WLG is an international law firm comprising the members of Gowling WLG International Limited, an English Company Limited by Guarantee, and their respective affiliates. Each member and affiliate is an autonomous and independent entity. Gowling WLG International Limited promotes, facilitates and co-ordinates the activities of its members but does not itself provide services to clients. Our structure is explained in more detail on our Legal Information page.

  • Home
  • About
  • Gowling WLG
  • Legal information
  • Privacy statement
  • Cookie Policy

© 2023 Gowling WLG

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT