• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
  • Gowling WLG
  • Legal information
  • Privacy statement
  • Cookie Policy
  • Home
  • About
  • Posts
  • Blogs
    • B2022
    • The IP Blog
    • Public Law & Regulation
    • AI
    • The UPC Blog

LoupedIn

To the good? – The Week in HR

Published on September 16, 2016 by Ian Chapman-Curry

To the good? – The Week in HR

The Oxford English Dictionary describes the etymology of bonus as being ‘an ignorant or jocular application of Latin bonus (“good (man)”‘. It goes on to explain that the word was probably originally intended ‘to signify a boon, “a good thing” (or bonum in Latin)’.

And bonuses have certainly been ‘a good thing’ for many in the City. It is no wonder that the word, according to the OED, probably originated as slang in the London Stock Exchange.

So it might be somewhat sacrilegious for me to ask my readers in the Square Mile whether it is time for the end of the bonus system?

Whilst bonus schemes have a great number of positives and can incentivise even the laziest of employees to work hard for that all important end of year bonus, some employers are questioning whether or not they are still fit for purpose.

With many companies having a bonus scheme linked to company performance, some employees feel that they are not being rewarded for their performance if their company doesn’t achieve its targets.

Throw in individual targets, personal goals and metrics and you might find that your bonus system has become overly complicated. For some, it becomes a source of anger or irritation – exactly the opposite result than originally intended. As a result, some companies’ feel that the time has come to get rid of their bonus schemes altogether.

Can a company simply remove their bonus schemes? The short, if not very revelatory answer, is that it depends on the circumstances but, if it has been in existence for a period of time, it might not be so easy for employers to bin the bonus.

If employers have given their employees an annual bonus for a number of years, this can lead to a contractual entitlement for the employee to be awarded their bonus. If the bonus scheme simply shut up shop, this could result in claims by the employee against the employer.

This is not to say that you can’t amend a bonus scheme. As with any changes to an employees express or implied contractual entitlements, this is best achieved by embarking on a period of consultation. Engaging with the workforce might produce exactly the kind of boost to productivity and morale that the system was originally designed to engender.

What is the alternative? Non-cash incentives, ad-hoc or more regular performance-related payments, salary increases and share incentives present some options.

Perhaps it is time to ask your employees ‘what would most motivate you’?

Discrimination risks: requirement to speak English at work and dress codes

Does your workplace policy disadvantage certain nationalities and religions?

Hopefully not intentionally.

What about English language requirements?

That’s a question that has become more and more of an issue over recent years. Millions of workers in the UK don’t speak English as their first language. Does this matter?

The Immigration Act 2016 will introduce a new duty for public authorities to ensure that their employees in customer-facing roles speak fluent English. This will be accompanied by a statutory code of practice, expected to come into force in October 2016.

Employers should, however, think carefully about how this is reflected in workplace policies. For example, rather than banning from speaking ‘foreign’ languages, employers should perhaps make clear that English is the language of operation for their business. Additionally, employers should make sure that any policy has a genuine business reason to exist as an extra layer of protection.

So, that deals with language. What about dress?

There have been a spate of news reports, articles and even cases on what you can and can’t wear at work. In the last few months, we had to think whether or not it is acceptable to force women to wear high heeled shoes at work. What about religious symbols? Do they fit with uniform policies? What about health and safety?

The issue of the workplace dress code and direct discrimination is now coming to the fore. There are two cases currently in front of the European Court of Justice relating to bans on employees wearing religious symbols at work.

When the Court makes its ruling, sometime towards the end of the year, it will certainly be one to keep an eye out for.

About the author(s)

Photo of Ian Chapman-Curry
Ian Chapman-Curry
See recent posts

Ian is a London-based professional support lawyer (PSL) legal director. Ian is a member of our pensions and combined human resource solutions (CHRS) teams. He works with clients to solve their employment and pensions law issues. Ian maintains a particular focus on 'crossover' issues that benefit from his understanding of both areas of law.

  • Ian Chapman-Curry
    https://loupedin.blog/author/ianchapmancurry/
    The Victorian workhouse revisited - The Week in HR
  • Ian Chapman-Curry
    https://loupedin.blog/author/ianchapmancurry/
    Keeping the purse strings tight - The Week in HR
  • Ian Chapman-Curry
    https://loupedin.blog/author/ianchapmancurry/
    Get on your bike - The Week in HR
  • Ian Chapman-Curry
    https://loupedin.blog/author/ianchapmancurry/
    Return of the boomerang employee - The Week in HR

Ian Chapman-Curry

Ian is a London-based professional support lawyer (PSL) legal director. Ian is a member of our pensions and combined human resource solutions (CHRS) teams. He works with clients to solve their employment and pensions law issues. Ian maintains a particular focus on 'crossover' issues that benefit from his understanding of both areas of law.

Filed Under: Opinion Tagged With: Week in HR

Views expressed in this blog do not necessarily reflect those of Gowling WLG.

NOT LEGAL ADVICE. Information made available on this website in any form is for information purposes only. It is not, and should not be taken as, legal advice. You should not rely on, or take or fail to take any action based upon this information. Never disregard professional legal advice or delay in seeking legal advice because of something you have read on this website. Gowling WLG professionals will be pleased to discuss resolutions to specific legal concerns you may have.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Transferring data out of China? Understand the key points from the Chinese Standard Contractual Clauses
  • Getting ready for pensions dashboards
  • Unified Patent Court to start on 1 June 2023 as Germany ratifies

Tags

apprenticeships (5) Artificial Intelligence (AI) (52) Autonomous vehicles (11) b2022 (18) Birmingham 2022 (8) Birmingham 2022 Commonwealth Games (14) brand protection (5) Brands and designs (5) Brexit (23) china (5) Climate change (12) COP26 (11) Copyright (8) COVID-19 (23) Cyber security (5) Data protection (6) Employment (13) employment law (9) Environment (8) ESG (21) ESG and pensions (9) financial services (5) Intellectual Property (59) IP (9) Life sciences (6) net zero (6) Patents (28) Pensions (41) Pension scams (5) Pension Schemes Act 2021 (11) Pensions dashboards (7) Pensions in 2022 (10) Pensions law (31) Procurement (7) Public Law & Regulation (39) Real Estate (16) Retail (6) sustainability (7) Tech (45) The Week In Pensions (11) Trademarks (13) UK (15) unified patents court (9) UPC (24) Week in HR (8)

Categories

Archives

Gowling WLG is an international law firm comprising the members of Gowling WLG International Limited, an English Company Limited by Guarantee, and their respective affiliates. Each member and affiliate is an autonomous and independent entity. Gowling WLG International Limited promotes, facilitates and co-ordinates the activities of its members but does not itself provide services to clients. Our structure is explained in more detail on our Legal Information page.

Footer

LoupedIn is the Official Gowling WLG Blog. Gowling WLG is an international law firm comprising the members of Gowling WLG International Limited, an English Company Limited by Guarantee, and their respective affiliates. Each member and affiliate is an autonomous and independent entity. Gowling WLG International Limited promotes, facilitates and co-ordinates the activities of its members but does not itself provide services to clients. Our structure is explained in more detail on our Legal Information page.

  • Home
  • About
  • Gowling WLG
  • Legal information
  • Privacy statement
  • Cookie Policy

© 2023 Gowling WLG

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT