• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
  • Gowling WLG
  • Legal information
  • Privacy statement
  • Cookie Policy
  • Home
  • About
  • Posts
  • Blogs
    • B2022
    • The IP Blog
    • Public Law & Regulation
    • AI
    • The Unified Patents Court

LoupedIn

How to avoid copyright infringement online

June 29, 2018, Gowling WLG

How to avoid copyright infringement online

As retail sees a continuous shift from bricks and mortar stores, we look at how to avoid copyright infringement online.

Online shopping has become the go-to for both consumers and businesses seeking speed and convenience. According to the latest report from the Office for National Statistics, e-commerce sales in 2016 were made up of £236 billion in website sales and £274 billion in electronic data interchange (EDI) sales or business-to-business sales.

The BBC recently reported on the growth of the online fashion retailer Boohoo. Boohoo saw their revenues jump by 53% in the three months to the end of May, with UK revenues up by 49% and US revenues up by 75%. In a previous report in March, the company stated that pre-tax profit had risen by 40% to £181.3 million.

The success of the online-only retailer is a stark contrast to the many household names making the headlines in recent weeks as retail brands continue to struggle in the market. Businesses that have dominated the high street for decades are being forced to announce store closures and job losses as they face difficult times. While it cannot be said that the growth in online shopping is the sole cause of the current problems facing the high street, it can be assumed that it is a contributing factor.

For many businesses, an e-commerce presence is now a necessity, enabling them to reach a far greater percentage of potential buyers. It is important, however, that brands considering the benefits of e-commerce are prepared for the risks that operating online can bring, especially from a legal perspective.

Businesses that are in the process of launching e-commerce platforms need to consider the actions that they need to implement to protect their brand. Copyright or trademark infringements that take place online can be more difficult to take action against.

How is copyright and trademark infringement different online?

The difference between the Internet and the “real world” is that the Internet allows people their anonymity. If someone really wants to hide their identity online they can, and in most cases, they do so very easily.

If a copyright or trademark infringement were to happen away from the Internet then you can take action against the infringer because you know who they are. You are able to get a court order to prevent them from doing it again, and hopefully a damages payment and your costs covered. This process does not work on the Internet. Infringements online can be difficult to take action against because you may not be able to identify the infringer and they could be anywhere in the world.

Even if you are able to narrow down the infringer’s whereabouts to a specific country then there are other issues you will need to consider. You may not be able to prove that the infringement has occurred in that jurisdiction. You may also not be able to take action because you do not have intellectual property protection in that country. You would also need to consider things like where the infringer’s servers are based. If they’re in another country then you may have difficulty proving the infringement. You would also need to consider the countries that the goods are being sent from and where the customers that have bought them are based.

The issue with infringements online is that even if you do manage to take action against the infringer they can always set up another website elsewhere and still reach the same customers.

In a lot of cases, infringers can often be identified, tackled at the source and their infringement stopped. The problem is that sellers of counterfeit goods are often serial infringers and they can be evasive.

Due to the nature of how infringement occurs online, it’s a good idea to be aware of techniques that you can utilise to protect your brand and make infringement more difficult.

How do domain complaints work?

One approach to help protect your brand online is “domain name complaints”. A domain name is the address that is used to access your website, e.g. Gowling WLG’s domain name is “gowlingwlg.com”. Domain names attract the people you want to sell to and give credibility to the websites that use them.

For example, if you come across a domain name such as “guccioutletstore.com” you may think that discount handbags are genuinely on sale when they could just be counterfeits sold by anyone who has the ability to set up a website. It is common for domain names to be used in this way to commit fraud. To make sure that these domain names are not available to be used in such a way you are able to take action and have them transferred to you. For example, as Gucci’s brand name is being used in the domain name then they would be able to request for the domain to be transferred to them.

If asking for the transfer of a domain name does not work then it is possible to have them forcibly transferred to you through a domain complaint. When you register for a domain name, you have to agree to a contract with the registrar. The fine print of the contract will state a number of mandatory terms. For example, the person registering the domain will need to agree to not register or use the domain name in a way that will infringe anyone else’s intellectual property rights.

Domain name contracts also state that if there is a dispute concerning a domain name it has to be dealt with under a standard dispute resolution policy. There are several different dispute resolution policies that are dependent on the different domain extensions such as .com or .co.uk. While there are different policies in place, the basic premise is that the owner of a brand can take action and make a complaint and, if successful, can have the domain name transferred to them.

How do payment method blocks work?

If you do experience some form of copyright or trademark infringement that is having a negative impact on your business you can stop the perpetrator from gaining money from the activity by blocking the payment methods on their website. This is where you ask the payment processor (such as PayPal or Visa) to stop processing payments if websites are selling counterfeit versions of your product or services. While the infringer could move to a different processor, you are making the process of gaining money from selling your goods more difficult.

To put a payment method block in place you can either contact the specific payment processor directly or use the International AntiCounterfeiting Coalition’s (IACC) Rogueblock reporting tool which covers several different processors.

How do you protect your brand online?

If you are considering e-commerce, or have a platform already in place, you need to be confident that you are able to protect your brand online from copyright or trademark infringement. Even businesses who do not operate using an e-commerce platform should consider how copyright infringement online can damage your brand and relationships with potential customers. A business with a website used only for marketing purposes can still be a victim of copyright or trademark infringement.

Our Insights and Resources are recommended for businesses considering e-commerce or concerned about protecting their copyright or trademarks online. We will update you regularly with information from our legal experts on intellectual property law, as well as other sectors and services you may be interested in.

About the author(s)

Gowling WLG
See recent postsBlog biography

Gowling WLG is an international law firm operating across an array of different sectors and services. Our LoupedIn blog aims to give readers industry insight, technical knowledge and thoughtful observations on the legal landscape and beyond.

  • Gowling WLG
    South Asian Heritage Month: Sharing our stories, celebrating our roots
  • Gowling WLG
    Why good culture can’t wait: six things legal leaders can do now
  • Gowling WLG
    Ensuring the emerging geography of AI doesn’t become a TRAIN-wreck
  • Gowling WLG
    Celebrating Black History Month: Stories from our community
  • Gowling WLG
    No revocation carve-out and related actions – 2nd UPC decision on the merits
  • Gowling WLG
    The first UPC decision on the merits is here
  • Gowling WLG
    Milan goes live! 
  • Gowling WLG
    Celebrating Volunteers’ Week at Gowling WLG
  • Gowling WLG
    Gowling WLG at UKREiiF 2024
  • Gowling WLG
    The AI Act and IP
  • Gowling WLG
    The USPTO’s Guidance on AI-Assisted Inventions
  • Gowling WLG
    Gowling WLG at MIPIM 2024
  • Gowling WLG
    Text and data mining – A UK Update
  • Gowling WLG
    COP28 – The role of youth, education and skills in driving climate goals
  • Gowling WLG
    The US looks at AI and copyright
  • Gowling WLG
    The EU AI Act and IP
  • Gowling WLG
    London Tech Week 2023: Health tech and innovation
  • Gowling WLG
    Everything you always wanted to know about the UPC but were afraid to ask
  • Gowling WLG
    A new dawn for pharmaceutical legislation in Europe?
  • Gowling WLG
    Unified Patent Court to start on 1 June 2023 as Germany ratifies
  • Gowling WLG
    What I have learned from my solicitor apprenticeship
  • Gowling WLG
    Copyright in the outputs of generative AI
  • Gowling WLG
    AI and copyright in 2022
  • Gowling WLG
    AI patentability and sufficiency: new UK guidance
  • Gowling WLG
    Birmingham… the City of a Thousand Sounds
  • Gowling WLG
    Let’s Go Forward Bab
  • Gowling WLG
    What’s netball, eh?
  • Gowling WLG
    How am ya bab: welcoming the world for Birmingham’s finest hour
  • Gowling WLG
    Investigating self-driving safety – what about IP?
  • Gowling WLG
    Artificial Intelligence in France
  • Gowling WLG
    Artificial Intelligence in the UK
  • Gowling WLG
    EU-based manufacturers and distributors wise to consider PI strategies in light of CJEU’s judgment
  • Gowling WLG
    The UK’s National AI Strategy: governance, regulation and law
  • Gowling WLG
    Best practice for patenting AI
  • Gowling WLG
    The Birmingham 2022 Festival – A Celebration of Creativity Across the West Midlands
  • Gowling WLG
    Will the UPC ban UK patent attorneys from representing clients before it?
  • Gowling WLG
    Everything looks set for the Unified Patents Court to go ahead this year but…. Are we really out of the woods yet?
  • Gowling WLG
    Unified Patents Court – News Update
  • Gowling WLG
    What’s next? A digital transformation roadmap
  • Gowling WLG
    Copyright vs. “fake news” – Deletion of user contributions from a copyright point of view
  • Gowling WLG
    The new Copyright Service Provider Act in Germany
  • Gowling WLG
    Life as a secondee at the Birmingham 2022 Commonwealth Games
  • Gowling WLG
    COP26: Latest updates from the climate change conference
  • Gowling WLG
    Practicable tips for trade secret protection during litigation in Germany
  • Gowling WLG
    AI and IP – what is your strategy?
  • Gowling WLG
    ESG: 5 reasons HR plays a key role
  • Gowling WLG
    Stuart Russell on AI Regulation
  • Gowling WLG
    The Unified Patent Court’s Protocol on Privileges and Immunities comes into force
  • Gowling WLG
    AI Assurance
  • Gowling WLG
    Actuaries tackle the ethics of AI and data science
  • Gowling WLG
    Will the US drive greater IP protection for AI?
  • Gowling WLG
    New government support for UK FinTech
  • Gowling WLG
    Working at a law firm: My experience as a business development student
  • Gowling WLG
    In defence of the workplace
  • Gowling WLG
    Africa Investment Conference 2021 – key takeaways
  • Gowling WLG
    Patents in 2020 – The year in review
  • Gowling WLG
    The National Digital Twin Legal Implications
  • Gowling WLG
    Pension Schemes Act 2021 and increased regulatory powers
  • Gowling WLG
    Pension Schemes Act 2021 and statutory right to transfer
  • Gowling WLG
    UK House of Lords warns against complacency towards AI
  • Gowling WLG
    UK competition authority publishes research on harm by algorithm
  • Gowling WLG
    UKIPO patent guidance updated for DABUS judgment
  • Gowling WLG
    EU report on AI-assisted creativity and invention
  • Gowling WLG
    AI and trade: the view from Europe
  • Gowling WLG
    Legal training contracts: A trainee’s perspective
  • Gowling WLG
    UK CDEI publishes review of bias in algorithmic decision-making
  • Gowling WLG
    Apply for UK Government funding for robotic AI by 20 November 2020
  • Gowling WLG
    The UKIPO’s AI-powered trade mark tool enters beta testing
  • Gowling WLG
    New UK laws to curb illegal deforestation in supply chains
  • Gowling WLG
    New guidance on AI and data protection from the ICO
  • Gowling WLG
    A conversation on the future regulation of AI
  • Gowling WLG
    New EC guidance on “trustworthy” artificial intelligence
  • Gowling WLG
    Guidelines for government procurement of AI in Canada
  • Gowling WLG
    Defining artificial intelligence
  • Gowling WLG
    WIPO’s revised paper on IP policy and AI
  • Gowling WLG
    The “Gee-Pay” – The Global Partnership on Artificial Intelligence
  • Gowling WLG
    The UK takes the temperature of AI opportunities, risks and governance
  • Gowling WLG
    UK guidance on explaining AI for GDPR compliance
  • Gowling WLG
    AI Procurement Toolkit published by the World Economic Forum
  • Gowling WLG
    The Law Commission’s second consultation on autonomous vehicles
  • Gowling WLG
    Could standards for Artificial General Intelligence save humanity?
  • Gowling WLG
    Artificial intelligence in healthcare: NHSX AI Lab publishes a buyer’s checklist
  • Gowling WLG
    How should we regulate online targeting?
  • Gowling WLG
    AI in aviation: regulating autonomous flights
  • Gowling WLG
    The UKIPO launches AI-powered assessments of trademark applications
  • Gowling WLG
    The UKIPO investigates AI-powered prior art searches
  • Gowling WLG
    USPTO denies patent application for invention by AI
  • Gowling WLG
    We need to talk about whistleblowing
  • Gowling WLG
    What is the Customs Union?
  • Gowling WLG
    Autonomous vehicles: are ethical guidelines needed?
  • Gowling WLG
    5G: How will businesses benefit?
  • Gowling WLG
    Using blockchain in advertising
  • Gowling WLG
    What digital infrastructure is needed for connected and autonomous vehicles (CAVS)?
  • Gowling WLG
    Protecting designs for multigenerational living
  • Gowling WLG
    Five ways the Internet has changed business
  • Gowling WLG
    Protectionism and tech’s raw materials
  • Gowling WLG
    Mental health at work: How to support your employees
  • Gowling WLG
    Electric vehicles (EVs): What are the indirect effects?
  • Gowling WLG
    Urban mobility: planning for the future
  • Gowling WLG
    What are the risks associated with driverless cars?
  • Gowling WLG
    What are a business’ digital risks?
  • Gowling WLG
    How will infrastructure need to change for connected and autonomous vehicles (CAVs)?
  • Gowling WLG
    Current office space trends
  • Gowling WLG
    Drafting leasing agreements for tenants in the life sciences sector
  • Gowling WLG
    How does tax work in the UK?
  • Gowling WLG
    How 3D printing is bringing modern housing to life
  • Gowling WLG
    Using blockchain for land registry
  • Gowling WLG
    What are the risks and benefits of cloud services?
  • Gowling WLG
    A guide to doing business in the UK
  • Gowling WLG
    Using discretionary powers as a pension trustee
  • Gowling WLG
    How will the UK plastic ban affect the food and drink industry?
  • Gowling WLG
    A guide to how patent law works
  • Gowling WLG
    Jaguar: the heart of UK Automotive
  • Gowling WLG
    Employees, Corporate Governance and a Grand Day Out

Gowling WLG

Gowling WLG is an international law firm operating across an array of different sectors and services. Our LoupedIn blog aims to give readers industry insight, technical knowledge and thoughtful observations on the legal landscape and beyond.

Filed Under: Opinion Tagged With: Intellectual Property

Views expressed in this blog do not necessarily reflect those of Gowling WLG.

NOT LEGAL ADVICE. Information made available on this website in any form is for information purposes only. It is not, and should not be taken as, legal advice. You should not rely on, or take or fail to take any action based upon this information. Never disregard professional legal advice or delay in seeking legal advice because of something you have read on this website. Gowling WLG professionals will be pleased to discuss resolutions to specific legal concerns you may have.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Reflections from the Pharma & Biotech Patent Litigation Europe Summit
  • Biodiversity Net Gain – difficult decisions kicked into the long grass
  • Nature-based investment risks and opportunities for pension schemes

Tags

Artificial Intelligence (AI) (65) Autonomous vehicles (11) b2022 (19) Birmingham 2022 (8) Birmingham 2022 Commonwealth Games (15) Brexit (23) Climate change (18) Collective defined contribution (6) COP26 (11) Copyright (11) COVID-19 (23) Cyber security (7) Data protection (8) Defined contribution (7) Dispute Resolution (15) Employment (15) employment law (14) Environment (19) Environmental Societal Governance (9) ESG (56) ESG and pensions (13) General Election 2024 and pensions (8) Intellectual Property (90) IP (12) Life sciences (9) litigation funding (9) net zero (6) Patents (41) Pensions (54) Pension Schemes Act 2021 (11) Pensions dashboards (7) Pensions in 2022 (10) Pensions law (45) Procurement (7) Public Law & Regulation (39) Real Estate (28) Retail (8) sustainability (22) Tech (58) The Week In Pensions (11) Trademarks (16) UK (15) unified patents court (9) UPC (40) Week in HR (8)

Categories

Archives

Gowling WLG is an international law firm comprising the members of Gowling WLG International Limited, an English Company Limited by Guarantee, and their respective affiliates. Each member and affiliate is an autonomous and independent entity. Gowling WLG International Limited promotes, facilitates and co-ordinates the activities of its members but does not itself provide services to clients. Our structure is explained in more detail on our Legal Information page.

Footer

  • Home
  • About
  • Gowling WLG
  • Legal information
  • Privacy statement
  • Cookie Policy

© 2026 Gowling WLG