• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
  • Gowling WLG
  • Legal information
  • Privacy statement
  • Cookie Policy
  • Home
  • About
  • Posts
  • Blogs
    • B2022
    • The IP Blog
    • Public Law & Regulation
    • AI
    • The Unified Patents Court

LoupedIn

Government consults on changes to food allergen labelling

January 25, 2019, Ravi Randhawa

Government consults on changes to food allergen labelling

Working together, the Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (Defra) and the Food Standards Agency have issued a consultation on proposed changes to food allergen labelling in order to enable consumers to be provided with the information they need to make safe food choices.

The consultation focuses on food which is ‘pre-packed for direct sale’ (PPDS). This is where the food is packed, in anticipation of it being sold to the consumer, on the same premises from which it is sold. Some examples of PPDS foods include boxed sandwiches and salads prepared in a café, or pre-weighed and packed cheese or meats from a deli counter.

At present EU law sets the legal framework for the labelling of PPDS foods and treats these types of food products the same as non-prepacked food (e.g. such as that served in a restaurant). This means that while food allergen information has to be provided in respect of such products, the manner in which it is provided is left to each individual member state to determine. The UK has determined, as provided for in the Food Information Regulations 2014 (the 2014 Regulations), that allergen information for non-prepacked foods – which for this purpose includes PPDS products – does not need to be provided on the food packaging itself but may be given to the customer verbally by a member of staff at the premises from which it is sold.

The consultation proposes four possible policy options for meeting the stated objective of consumers being provided with sufficient and accurate information to make safe food choices. These are:

  1. Promoting best practice – which would likely involve the issuing of guidance to the catering sector by the Food Standards Agency, as well as a public information campaign to highlight allergen awareness.
  2. The inclusion of ‘ask the staff’ labels on all packaging for PPDS foods. The 2014 Regulations do in fact already require food business operators to use such indicators; however currently there is a choice about whether to include these on the packaging itself, or elsewhere in the premises.
  3. A requirement to include the name of the food and only the relevant allergens in that food on the food packaging itself – this is most likely to be achieved by amending the 2014 Regulations to remove the possibility of allergen information being given verbally in the case of PPDS foods.
  4. To align the position with prepacked foods more generally and impose a requirement for the PPDS food products to be labelled with a full ingredients list.

For each policy option there is a high level impact assessment for businesses – as well as broad assessments of the likely efficacy of the measures from a consumer protection perspective – which may be useful for businesses in shaping their responses to the consultation.

Interested parties are able to respond on a wide range of relevant issues, including their preferred preference from the four options, their views on a proposed two-tier approach (with different rules for smaller and larger businesses), and an opportunity to give evidence in relation to the likely cost and operational impact of changes.

The consultation will remain open until 29 March, and responses can be made either through an online form or by post.

About the author(s)

Photo of Ravi Randhawa
Ravi Randhawa
Legal Director at Gowling WLG (UK) LLP |  See recent postsBlog biography

Ravi Randhawa assists clients to act within the parameters set by their governing statutory and regulatory frameworks, and where applicable the broader requirements of public administrative law, and to make decisions which are fully informed by and compliant with the legal framework within which they operate.

  • Ravi Randhawa
    https://loupedin.blog/author/ravirandhawa/
    Sustainability allies: pro bono support for KIND
  • Ravi Randhawa
    https://loupedin.blog/author/ravirandhawa/
    Court upholds refusal of badger culling licence
  • Ravi Randhawa
    https://loupedin.blog/author/ravirandhawa/
    Administrative Court finds the decision not to include gig workers in the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme lawful
  • Ravi Randhawa
    https://loupedin.blog/author/ravirandhawa/
    Court of Appeal confirms high threshold for injunctions preventing publication of Ofsted reports

Ravi Randhawa

Ravi Randhawa assists clients to act within the parameters set by their governing statutory and regulatory frameworks, and where applicable the broader requirements of public administrative law, and to make decisions which are fully informed by and compliant with the legal framework within which they operate.

Filed Under: Opinion, Public Law & Regulation Tagged With: Food and drink, Public Law & Regulation

Views expressed in this blog do not necessarily reflect those of Gowling WLG.

NOT LEGAL ADVICE. Information made available on this website in any form is for information purposes only. It is not, and should not be taken as, legal advice. You should not rely on, or take or fail to take any action based upon this information. Never disregard professional legal advice or delay in seeking legal advice because of something you have read on this website. Gowling WLG professionals will be pleased to discuss resolutions to specific legal concerns you may have.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Sole(ly) aesthetic? The Birkenstock Sandal goes to the Federal Court of Justice
  • UK Litigation Funding: reform or retain?
  • Arbitration Act 2025 receives Royal Assent

Tags

Artificial Intelligence (AI) (62) Autonomous vehicles (11) b2022 (19) Birmingham 2022 (8) Birmingham 2022 Commonwealth Games (15) Brexit (23) Climate change (16) Collective defined contribution (6) COP26 (11) Copyright (11) COVID-19 (23) Cyber security (7) Data protection (8) Defined contribution (7) Dispute Resolution (14) Employment (14) employment law (11) Environment (18) Environmental Societal Governance (9) ESG (50) ESG and pensions (11) General Election 2024 and pensions (8) Intellectual Property (86) IP (10) Life sciences (7) litigation funding (8) net zero (6) Patents (40) Pensions (53) Pension Schemes Act 2021 (11) Pensions dashboards (7) Pensions in 2022 (10) Pensions law (43) Procurement (7) Public Law & Regulation (39) Real Estate (27) Retail (8) sustainability (21) Tech (58) The Week In Pensions (11) Trademarks (16) UK (15) unified patents court (9) UPC (39) Week in HR (8)

Categories

Archives

Gowling WLG is an international law firm comprising the members of Gowling WLG International Limited, an English Company Limited by Guarantee, and their respective affiliates. Each member and affiliate is an autonomous and independent entity. Gowling WLG International Limited promotes, facilitates and co-ordinates the activities of its members but does not itself provide services to clients. Our structure is explained in more detail on our Legal Information page.

Footer

  • Home
  • About
  • Gowling WLG
  • Legal information
  • Privacy statement
  • Cookie Policy

© 2025 Gowling WLG