• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
  • Gowling WLG
  • Legal information
  • Privacy statement
  • Cookie Policy
  • Home
  • About
  • Public Law & Regulation
  • AI
  • Posts

LoupedIn

Published on August 27, 2020 by Jocelyn Paulley and Rocio de la Cruz

What do organisations thinking of using facial recognition software need to do following the Court of Appeal judgement in R (Bridges) v CC South Wales?


We have identified four general principles that any organisation wanting to use facial recognition technology should consider following this judgement (as the context and grounds of appeal are to some extent specific in the context of use of facial recognition technology by the police force):

  1. Any use of facial recognition technology must undergo a Data Protection Impact Assessment which should assume that the right to privacy under the European Convention on Human Rights is engaged and likely to be infringed by the use of the technology.
  2. The benefits gained by use of facial recognition technology can outweigh an individual’s right to privacy. This will clearly be context-specific but the use by the police in this instance was proportionate. This balancing exercise must be clearly documented (in a Data Protection Impact Assessment) by an organisation to show that the effect on individuals’ right to privacy under the Human Rights Act has been considered and risks mitigated where possible.
  3. Clearly then facial recognition technology does interfere with an individual’s right to privacy so any use must be “in accordance with the law”. Whilst overall the use of the technology was proportionate, giving individuals (in this case, police officers) discretion as to when it is used and who the technology identifies is unlikely to be “in accordance with the law” unless there is very clear guidance.
  4. Consider whether the facial recognition technology will result in any discrimination or bias. In this case, specific public sector legislation dealing with equality was engaged. Whilst this will not be the case for private sector organisations, the courts are clearly alive to the potential for discrimination and expect users of these systems to satisfy themselves that there will be no bias.

Read on for a more detailed analysis of this judgement via the Gowling WLG website.

About the author(s)

Photo of Jocelyn Paulley
Jocelyn Paulley
Gowling WLG Profile | See all posts
  • Jocelyn Paulley
    https://loupedin.blog/author/jocelynpaulley/
    If the shoppers can't come to the shops, let the shops come to them: Can AI save our shops?
Rocio de la Cruz
Gowling WLG Profile | See all posts
  • Rocio de la Cruz
    https://loupedin.blog/author/rociodelacruz/
    UK guidance on explaining AI for GDPR compliance

Jocelyn Paulley and Rocio de la Cruz

Filed Under: AI Tagged With: Artificial Intelligence (AI)

Views expressed in this blog do not necessarily reflect those of Gowling WLG.

NOT LEGAL ADVICE. Information made available on this website in any form is for information purposes only. It is not, and should not be taken as, legal advice. You should not rely on, or take or fail to take any action based upon this information. Never disregard professional legal advice or delay in seeking legal advice because of something you have read on this website. Gowling WLG professionals will be pleased to discuss resolutions to specific legal concerns you may have.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • UKIPO patent guidance updated for DABUS judgment
  • Back to School – or not: the first mass-use of Section 44(1)(d) & (e) Employment Rights Act 1996?
  • Consolidated in-store experiences – the new way forward?

Footer

LoupedIn is the Official Gowling WLG Blog. Gowling WLG is an international law firm comprising the members of Gowling WLG International Limited, an English Company Limited by Guarantee, and their respective affiliates. Each member and affiliate is an autonomous and independent entity. Gowling WLG International Limited promotes, facilitates and co-ordinates the activities of its members but does not itself provide services to clients. Our structure is explained in more detail on our Legal Information page.

  • Home
  • About
  • Gowling WLG
  • Legal information
  • Privacy statement
  • Cookie Policy

Gowling WLG 2020

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled

Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.

Non-necessary

Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.