• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
  • Gowling WLG
  • Legal information
  • Privacy statement
  • Cookie Policy
  • Home
  • About
  • Posts
  • Blogs
    • B2022
    • The IP Blog
    • Public Law & Regulation
    • AI
    • The Unified Patents Court

LoupedIn

AI and trade: the view from Europe

December 7, 2020, Gowling WLG

AI and trade: the view from Europe

The European Parliament has published two briefings and an in-depth analysis on “Data flows, artificial intelligence and international trade: impacts and prospects for the value chains of the future”. In Part 1, we summarize the EU’s briefing on the socio-economic effects: a fall in trade of manufactured products and unprecedent global competition (and outsourcing) in services.

Socio-economic effects of digital trade and AI on global supply chains and EU trade

The first briefing suggests that digital trade is likely “to vastly increase trade between advanced and emerging economies”, raising “important issues for domestic policies and trade policy”. It views artificial intelligence (AI) as a “general-purpose technology” with the potential “to transform digital trade by greatly reducing geographical barriers”. It finds that “digital technologies have fundamentally changed the behaviour of consumers” by “increasing the transparency over information about products that are available to consumers” and “monetising data in digital services” through personalised products and services. It also notes that blockchain technology has reduced reliance on intermediaries.

digital technologies have fundamentally changed the behaviour of consumers

The briefing warns that “trust is a fundamental factor for the growth and success of online trade”. (The EU, and other governmental and inter-governmental bodies, have repeatedly raised trust as a key challenge for the use of AI; see, for example, the European Commission’s White Paper on Artificial Intelligence: a European approach to excellence and trust.) It notes the EU safeguards within the General Data Protection Regulation and the EU’s promotion of data portability in the Free Flow of Data Regulation and The Digital Content Directive. It further warns of market concentration “through data-driven economies of scope and the presence of strong network effects”, naming familiar Big Tech companies.

robotics and AI may actually reduce trade in manufactured goods, while vastly increasing trade in services

The briefing predicts that AI may “reduce trade in manufactured goods”, further reducing employment in manufacturing. The trade implications will be affected by AI’s impact on transportation and transaction costs and on the labour-intensity of production. If the latter falls, manufacturing may be localised, reducing trade, particularly if transport costs remain significant. This effect could be increased by additive manufacturing (aka 3D printing), although its use is “still very limited”.

By contrast, digital transformation “is making more and more services digitally deliverable”. Services will be relatively labour-intensive, driving companies to “delocalise production from advanced countries to countries with relatively cheap skilled labour” and encouraging more companies to use “telemigrants” (foreign-based online service workers) – a trend accelerated by COVID-19. The briefing predicts:

Soon it will be to South Asia (mainly India) and other countries with good education systems, that services jobs from advanced economies will migrate, and on a much bigger scale than what has already occurred.

European workers in services that were “hitherto non-tradable (or little tradable)” and have been “sheltered” to date from international competition will face outsourcing. The briefing does not predict the impact on employment, but notes that globalisation has, so far, changed the composition of EU jobs, not the number of jobs, and increased leisure time.

The briefing proposes that the key policy areas are trade and domestic. In trade, the EU need to pursue market access for digital services, e.g. through the on-going WTO plurilateral negotiations on e-commerce. Domestic policy needs to focus on “equipping people to master digital technologies and adapt to change”: education, training, retraining and flexi-security, potentially paid for by taxing digital activities. It suggests that:

More than ever, societies with flexi-security policies, like the Nordic countries, which combine high quality education and people rather than job security, will be best prepared to manage the digital transformation.

About the author(s)

Gowling WLG
See recent postsBlog biography

Gowling WLG is an international law firm operating across an array of different sectors and services. Our LoupedIn blog aims to give readers industry insight, technical knowledge and thoughtful observations on the legal landscape and beyond.

  • Gowling WLG
    https://loupedin.blog/author/gowlingwlg/
    Ensuring the emerging geography of AI doesn’t become a TRAIN-wreck
  • Gowling WLG
    https://loupedin.blog/author/gowlingwlg/
    Celebrating Black History Month: Stories from our community
  • Gowling WLG
    https://loupedin.blog/author/gowlingwlg/
    No revocation carve-out and related actions – 2nd UPC decision on the merits
  • Gowling WLG
    https://loupedin.blog/author/gowlingwlg/
    The first UPC decision on the merits is here

Gowling WLG

Gowling WLG is an international law firm operating across an array of different sectors and services. Our LoupedIn blog aims to give readers industry insight, technical knowledge and thoughtful observations on the legal landscape and beyond.

Filed Under: AI Tagged With: Trade & Competition

Views expressed in this blog do not necessarily reflect those of Gowling WLG.

NOT LEGAL ADVICE. Information made available on this website in any form is for information purposes only. It is not, and should not be taken as, legal advice. You should not rely on, or take or fail to take any action based upon this information. Never disregard professional legal advice or delay in seeking legal advice because of something you have read on this website. Gowling WLG professionals will be pleased to discuss resolutions to specific legal concerns you may have.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • UPC’s first decision concerning a second medical use patent
  • Sole(ly) aesthetic? The Birkenstock Sandal goes to the Federal Court of Justice
  • UK Litigation Funding: reform or retain?

Tags

Artificial Intelligence (AI) (62) Autonomous vehicles (11) b2022 (19) Birmingham 2022 (8) Birmingham 2022 Commonwealth Games (15) Brexit (23) Climate change (16) Collective defined contribution (6) COP26 (11) Copyright (11) COVID-19 (23) Cyber security (7) Data protection (8) Defined contribution (7) Dispute Resolution (14) Employment (14) employment law (11) Environment (18) Environmental Societal Governance (9) ESG (50) ESG and pensions (11) General Election 2024 and pensions (8) Intellectual Property (87) IP (10) Life sciences (7) litigation funding (8) net zero (6) Patents (41) Pensions (53) Pension Schemes Act 2021 (11) Pensions dashboards (7) Pensions in 2022 (10) Pensions law (43) Procurement (7) Public Law & Regulation (39) Real Estate (27) Retail (8) sustainability (21) Tech (58) The Week In Pensions (11) Trademarks (16) UK (15) unified patents court (9) UPC (40) Week in HR (8)

Categories

Archives

Gowling WLG is an international law firm comprising the members of Gowling WLG International Limited, an English Company Limited by Guarantee, and their respective affiliates. Each member and affiliate is an autonomous and independent entity. Gowling WLG International Limited promotes, facilitates and co-ordinates the activities of its members but does not itself provide services to clients. Our structure is explained in more detail on our Legal Information page.

Footer

  • Home
  • About
  • Gowling WLG
  • Legal information
  • Privacy statement
  • Cookie Policy

© 2025 Gowling WLG