• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
  • Gowling WLG
  • Legal information
  • Privacy statement
  • Cookie Policy
  • Home
  • About
  • Posts
  • Blogs
    • B2022
    • The IP Blog
    • Public Law & Regulation
    • AI
    • The Unified Patents Court

LoupedIn

Pension Schemes Act 2021 and collective defined contribution

January 25, 2021, Ben Long

Pension Schemes Act 2021 and collective defined contribution

Key points

  • The Pension Schemes Act 2021 (the PSA 2021) establishes the legal framework for collective defined contribution (CDC) schemes. More detail will be forthcoming in secondary legislation and regulatory guidance.
  • CDC schemes are shared risk schemes in which risks are shared between all of the members of the scheme.
  • CDC schemes do not carry additional risks for employers – employers’ liabilities under CDC schemes are limited to the contributions they make in respect of members (as in a traditional defined contribution (DC) scheme).
  • The first CDC scheme is likely to be the one established by the Royal Mail. At this stage, it isn’t clear whether any other employers will follow. One key factor will be whether regulations are made that allow unassociated multi-employer mastertrusts to provide CDC schemes.

What are collective defined contribution schemes?

The PSA 2021 establishes the framework for a new kind of pension scheme – the collective defined contribution (CDC) scheme.

CDC schemes share the most important features of individual DC schemes – like DC schemes, the benefits of each member will depend on:

  • how much money is in the member’s fund (which will depend on the amount of contributions made in respect of that member and the investment performance of the fund); and
  • the expected cost of providing the pension benefit (which will depend on when the member takes a pension, life expectancies, etc.)

The key difference in a CDC scheme is that while a member of a DC scheme has to bear all the risks of providing the pension themselves – particularly around investment and longevity – in a CDC scheme these risks are pooled. The promise of CDC is that by sharing those risks, members would receive a substantially greater income in retirement than they would from a CDC scheme. This approach has received some support from modelling carried out by some of the UK’s actuarial consultancies.

“Crucially, the risks are shared among the members but not with the employers.”

Crucially, the risks are shared among the members but not with the employers. The liability of employers to contribute to a CDC scheme is therefore limited (broadly to the regular contributions they agree to make in respect of each employee). Employers participating in CDC schemes will, therefore, not have any unexpected deficits to manage in the future or have to deal with fluctuating pension costs.

The drive to get CDC legislation into the PSA 2021 came from Royal Mail and its employees (through their union, the CWU): establishing a CDC scheme was the solution to an industrial dispute between them. Both Royal Mail and the CWU have been keen to establish the agreed scheme.  We can therefore expect at least one CDC scheme to be up and running in around a year.

Although the PSA 2021 establishes the framework for CDC schemes, a lot of detail still needs to be filled in through secondary legislation. One aspect that will be closely watched is whether regulations will permit unassociated multi-employer mastertrusts to provide CDC schemes.

What does this mean for trustees?

For trustees of existing schemes, CDC schemes will not have a major immediate impact – the legislation is specific to the new separate CDC schemes.

In the longer term though, trustees of schemes with members still accruing DB benefits may find employers looking at CDC as an alternative provision. And for trustees of DC schemes, if CDC schemes deliver on their promise, the pensions they deliver will be highly relevant to what good outcomes look like.

What does this mean for employers?

Employers with open DB schemes may want to consider whether a CDC scheme would be an attractive alternative (and whether all employees could be offered membership). There is likely to be less interest from employers who currently only offer DC benefits but, again, if CDC schemes are successful they may form part of what a good benefits package looks like.

At present, the PSA 2021 only allows a single employer or a connected group of employers to participate in a particular CDC scheme. This means that, initially at least, there is likely to be a minimum size of employer for whom setting up a CDC scheme will be feasible. Going forward, the success of CDC may well depend on whether smaller employers are able to participate in CDC schemes provided by mastertrusts and other pension providers.

Download our one-page overviews of the Pension Schemes Act 2021

Click here to download our one-page overview of the Pension Schemes Act 2021 and what it means for trusteesDownload
Click here to download our one-page overview of the Pension Schemes Act 2021 and what it means for employers / scheme sponsorsDownload

About the author(s)

Ben Long
View Ben's profile |  See recent postsBlog biography

Ben Long helps clients resolve their pensions disputes to ensure that trustees, employers and members get the benefits they expect out of their pensions schemes.

    This author does not have any more posts.

Ben Long

Ben Long helps clients resolve their pensions disputes to ensure that trustees, employers and members get the benefits they expect out of their pensions schemes.

Filed Under: Analysis Tagged With: Collective defined contribution, Pension Schemes Act 2021, Pensions, Pensions law

Views expressed in this blog do not necessarily reflect those of Gowling WLG.

NOT LEGAL ADVICE. Information made available on this website in any form is for information purposes only. It is not, and should not be taken as, legal advice. You should not rely on, or take or fail to take any action based upon this information. Never disregard professional legal advice or delay in seeking legal advice because of something you have read on this website. Gowling WLG professionals will be pleased to discuss resolutions to specific legal concerns you may have.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • UPC’s first decision concerning a second medical use patent
  • Sole(ly) aesthetic? The Birkenstock Sandal goes to the Federal Court of Justice
  • UK Litigation Funding: reform or retain?

Tags

Artificial Intelligence (AI) (62) Autonomous vehicles (11) b2022 (19) Birmingham 2022 (8) Birmingham 2022 Commonwealth Games (15) Brexit (23) Climate change (16) Collective defined contribution (6) COP26 (11) Copyright (11) COVID-19 (23) Cyber security (7) Data protection (8) Defined contribution (7) Dispute Resolution (14) Employment (14) employment law (11) Environment (18) Environmental Societal Governance (9) ESG (50) ESG and pensions (11) General Election 2024 and pensions (8) Intellectual Property (87) IP (10) Life sciences (7) litigation funding (8) net zero (6) Patents (41) Pensions (53) Pension Schemes Act 2021 (11) Pensions dashboards (7) Pensions in 2022 (10) Pensions law (43) Procurement (7) Public Law & Regulation (39) Real Estate (27) Retail (8) sustainability (21) Tech (58) The Week In Pensions (11) Trademarks (16) UK (15) unified patents court (9) UPC (40) Week in HR (8)

Categories

Archives

Gowling WLG is an international law firm comprising the members of Gowling WLG International Limited, an English Company Limited by Guarantee, and their respective affiliates. Each member and affiliate is an autonomous and independent entity. Gowling WLG International Limited promotes, facilitates and co-ordinates the activities of its members but does not itself provide services to clients. Our structure is explained in more detail on our Legal Information page.

Footer

  • Home
  • About
  • Gowling WLG
  • Legal information
  • Privacy statement
  • Cookie Policy

© 2025 Gowling WLG