• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
  • Gowling WLG
  • Legal information
  • Privacy statement
  • Cookie Policy
  • Home
  • About
  • Posts
  • Blogs
    • B2022
    • The IP Blog
    • Public Law & Regulation
    • AI
    • The Unified Patents Court

LoupedIn

Mining tax systems for resource-rich countries

August 18, 2021, Andrew Wright

Mining tax systems for resource-rich countries

With demand for commodities increasing and prices rising, governments around the world are thinking about whether they should increase the tax-take on mining. It looks likely that we will move into a period of real tension over high commodity prices and profits versus the interests of individual countries .

Many Western nations seem to be attempting to increase their infrastructure spending to degrees not seen since the end of the second world war. Green issues are dominating the Western World and populism is forcing governments into physical action rather than mouthing the green mantra. The electric revolution requires commodities such as lithium graphite and PGEs  ( platinum group elements) and most of all copper.  To build windfarms you need steel for which you need coking coal . Throw into the mix that central governments have been printing money, the insidious killer, inflation, is now walking the streets.

Nature did not place minerals in the easiest and most accessible parts of the world. Many of the minerals required for the new revolution are to be found in many poorer developing countries, some of which are corrupt , have Marxist governments, or are run by populist politicians who have no long-term views. Others are fledgling democracies that rightly believe their countries should benefit from the higher prices to improve living conditions – so quite naturally they want to increase royalties and taxes. The question is going to be what is fair and at what point does it become uneconomic for companies  to mine.

So are we in for an era of resource nationalism? Mining companies will no doubt try to use the benefit of any Investment Treaty obligations. However, are these treaties always fair, why should a country constrict itself because it may be fettered from altering its own fiscal regime?

About the author(s)

Photo of Andrew Wright
Andrew Wright
View Andrew's profile |  See recent postsBlog biography

Andrew was formerly senior partner of a leading commercial law firm and built one of the best-known resource teams in the UK, acting for more quoted resource companies than any other UK firm over the last few years.

    This author does not have any more posts.

Filed Under: Opinion

Views expressed in this blog do not necessarily reflect those of Gowling WLG.

NOT LEGAL ADVICE. Information made available on this website in any form is for information purposes only. It is not, and should not be taken as, legal advice. You should not rely on, or take or fail to take any action based upon this information. Never disregard professional legal advice or delay in seeking legal advice because of something you have read on this website. Gowling WLG professionals will be pleased to discuss resolutions to specific legal concerns you may have.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Sole(ly) aesthetic? The Birkenstock Sandal goes to the Federal Court of Justice
  • UK Litigation Funding: reform or retain?
  • Arbitration Act 2025 receives Royal Assent

Tags

Artificial Intelligence (AI) (62) Autonomous vehicles (11) b2022 (19) Birmingham 2022 (8) Birmingham 2022 Commonwealth Games (15) Brexit (23) Climate change (16) Collective defined contribution (6) COP26 (11) Copyright (11) COVID-19 (23) Cyber security (7) Data protection (8) Defined contribution (7) Dispute Resolution (14) Employment (14) employment law (11) Environment (18) Environmental Societal Governance (9) ESG (50) ESG and pensions (11) General Election 2024 and pensions (8) Intellectual Property (86) IP (10) Life sciences (7) litigation funding (8) net zero (6) Patents (40) Pensions (53) Pension Schemes Act 2021 (11) Pensions dashboards (7) Pensions in 2022 (10) Pensions law (43) Procurement (7) Public Law & Regulation (39) Real Estate (27) Retail (8) sustainability (21) Tech (58) The Week In Pensions (11) Trademarks (16) UK (15) unified patents court (9) UPC (39) Week in HR (8)

Categories

Archives

Gowling WLG is an international law firm comprising the members of Gowling WLG International Limited, an English Company Limited by Guarantee, and their respective affiliates. Each member and affiliate is an autonomous and independent entity. Gowling WLG International Limited promotes, facilitates and co-ordinates the activities of its members but does not itself provide services to clients. Our structure is explained in more detail on our Legal Information page.

Footer

  • Home
  • About
  • Gowling WLG
  • Legal information
  • Privacy statement
  • Cookie Policy

© 2025 Gowling WLG