• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
  • Gowling WLG
  • Legal information
  • Privacy statement
  • Cookie Policy
  • Home
  • About
  • Posts
  • Blogs
    • B2022
    • The IP Blog
    • Public Law & Regulation
    • AI
    • The Unified Patents Court

LoupedIn

Who controls your opt-out?

October 21, 2021, Michael Carter

Who controls your opt-out?

The impact of the UPC on existing and future commercial arrangements

As the commencement of the Unified Patents Court looms larger, we are turning our thoughts to some of the really practical issues which need to be addressed with a degree of urgency now. We will be looking at the question of “opting out” of the UPC jurisdiction in a sequence of blog posts to follow, but we thought we would start by looking at some of the non-contentious issues which can arise as a result of the coming of the UPC and the Unitary Patent.

More than six years ago this firm published an article in Managing Intellectual Property entitled “The Unitary Patent for non-litigators“.  One of the points we made then was the need for companies who enter into commercial arrangements relating to patents (licences, security etc.) to carefully consider the impact of the UPC opt-out on their existing arrangements.  In particular, we noted that:

  • Patentees should check their EPs are registered with the correct details and whether the ownership of different designations of the same patent are owned by different companies, something which might then require agreement prior to deciding whether to opt-out;
  • Patentees should consider whether their existing licence agreements contain appropriate provisions to deal with the control of the opt-out decision and litigation.  At the very least, patentees should consider discussing whether to opt-out with their licensees to ensure they are aware of the decision and the reasons for it, and have clarity as to the circumstances in which the patentee may choose to opt-out, or to opt back in. These negotiations could take time and raise difficult issues, particularly given the risk/benefit analysis that needs to be undertaken when deciding whether to opt out.
  • Parties should review existing development agreements to ensure there is clarity over the opt-out treatment of any patents generated pursuant to that agreement; and
  • Parties should consider whether failing to opt patents out of the UPC has an impact on their value as security, and discuss with lenders if appropriate.

Whilst the UPC was effectively placed on hiatus (following the Brexit vote in the UK and constitutional challenges in Germany) companies could be forgiven for not taking steps to address these matters.  Certainly our experience is that very few companies have done so.  However, with the period for opting out expected to commence at some point in the first half of next year, the time available for these discussions to take place is now very limited and there is considerable scope for disagreement if perspectives on the opt out differ.  

About the author(s)

Michael Carter
Michael Carter
Principal Associate at Gowling WLG |  See recent postsBlog biography

Michael Carter is a principal associate in our award winning intellectual property team, with particular experience of enforcing a broad range of intellectual property rights. Having spent time on secondment at two leading automotive brands, he understands the challenges involved in building and maintaining a strong brand identity, and protecting the intellectual property rights in the technology which underpins the business.

  • Michael Carter
    https://loupedin.blog/author/michaelcarter/
    The Unitary Patent System – Expectations, Challenges, preparation

Michael Carter

Michael Carter is a principal associate in our award winning intellectual property team, with particular experience of enforcing a broad range of intellectual property rights. Having spent time on secondment at two leading automotive brands, he understands the challenges involved in building and maintaining a strong brand identity, and protecting the intellectual property rights in the technology which underpins the business.

Filed Under: Intellectual Property, The Unified Patents Court Tagged With: Brexit, Germany, Intellectual Property, IP, Patents, UK, unified patents court, UPC

Views expressed in this blog do not necessarily reflect those of Gowling WLG.

NOT LEGAL ADVICE. Information made available on this website in any form is for information purposes only. It is not, and should not be taken as, legal advice. You should not rely on, or take or fail to take any action based upon this information. Never disregard professional legal advice or delay in seeking legal advice because of something you have read on this website. Gowling WLG professionals will be pleased to discuss resolutions to specific legal concerns you may have.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Sole(ly) aesthetic? The Birkenstock Sandal goes to the Federal Court of Justice
  • UK Litigation Funding: reform or retain?
  • Arbitration Act 2025 receives Royal Assent

Tags

Artificial Intelligence (AI) (62) Autonomous vehicles (11) b2022 (19) Birmingham 2022 (8) Birmingham 2022 Commonwealth Games (15) Brexit (23) Climate change (16) Collective defined contribution (6) COP26 (11) Copyright (11) COVID-19 (23) Cyber security (7) Data protection (8) Defined contribution (7) Dispute Resolution (14) Employment (14) employment law (11) Environment (18) Environmental Societal Governance (9) ESG (50) ESG and pensions (11) General Election 2024 and pensions (8) Intellectual Property (86) IP (10) Life sciences (7) litigation funding (8) net zero (6) Patents (40) Pensions (53) Pension Schemes Act 2021 (11) Pensions dashboards (7) Pensions in 2022 (10) Pensions law (43) Procurement (7) Public Law & Regulation (39) Real Estate (27) Retail (8) sustainability (21) Tech (58) The Week In Pensions (11) Trademarks (16) UK (15) unified patents court (9) UPC (39) Week in HR (8)

Categories

Archives

Gowling WLG is an international law firm comprising the members of Gowling WLG International Limited, an English Company Limited by Guarantee, and their respective affiliates. Each member and affiliate is an autonomous and independent entity. Gowling WLG International Limited promotes, facilitates and co-ordinates the activities of its members but does not itself provide services to clients. Our structure is explained in more detail on our Legal Information page.

Footer

  • Home
  • About
  • Gowling WLG
  • Legal information
  • Privacy statement
  • Cookie Policy

© 2025 Gowling WLG