• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
  • Gowling WLG
  • Legal information
  • Privacy statement
  • Cookie Policy
  • Home
  • About
  • Posts
  • Blogs
    • B2022
    • The IP Blog
    • Public Law & Regulation
    • AI
    • The Unified Patents Court

LoupedIn

FCA expectations on hybrid and remote working

November 1, 2021, Sushil Kuner

FCA expectations on hybrid and remote working

With remote working being the norm for so long since the start of the pandemic, many firms will have invested significant time and effort over the past few months getting ready for a return to the office – including preparing for ongoing remote and so called ‘hybrid’ working arrangements. For firms regulated by the FCA, this has included ensuring all regulatory requirements can still be met.

To add to the mix, the FCA has recently published its expectations for those firms it already regulates, those applying to be regulated and also those proposing to submit further applications, including variations of permission and changes in control. They are here (Remote or hybrid working expectations for firms | FCA) but may well change over time as the FCA understands more about how firms intend to operate.

The expectations will be applied on a case by case basis and the FCA has been very clear that what they have set out are indicative considerations and they will assess firms on a case by case basis.  Whilst it may not change what you are doing as a regulated firm, it will be important to ensure that the FCA’s approach is kept under tabs and built into internal programmes.

They key considerations are:

  • The FCA expects to see proper planning in place, with notification to the FCA of any material changes to firms’ operations under their Principle 11 and/or SUP 15.3 obligations.
  • Firm’s risk management systems will need to be updated to reflect risks associated with new working arrangements. Control functions such as risk, compliance and internal audit will be expected to carry out their functions unaffected.  
  • The FCA will need to be, and remain, satisfied that remote working, or move to a non-centralised location, doesn’t affect the ability to meet threshold conditions or oversee its functions, including outsourced functions.
  • The FCA needs to be able to have ongoing access to firms, records and employees. This is wherever they work including at home!
  • Working arrangements must not harm consumers and market integrity, increase the risk of financial crime or reduce competition.
  • Firms should consider the effect of new working arrangements on their staff, including wellbeing, training and diversity and inclusion matters.

At the heart of ensuring that these are met is governance and culture, which of course falls on Senior Managers under the SM&CR. This means demonstrating that there has been appropriate planning and that there are sufficient controls in place to manage and mitigate risk. Senior Managers under the SM&CR are specifically cited as having responsibility for the governance and oversight in place.

This goes further than carrying out risk assessments and having the right policies, IT systems and information cascades in place. Staff will need clear communications and expectations so that all on the ship are sailing to the same place and everyone is in fact onboard. Senior Managers, again, will be responsible for ensuring that the right culture exists to allow both hybrid working, commercial success and all regulatory expectations to be met.

Time will tell how the FCA approaches what its sees as a failure of expectations but it would seem pretty clear that it will be monitoring firms closely and will take robust action where it finds failures.

About the author(s)

Photo of Sushil Kuner
Sushil Kuner
View Sushil's profile |  See recent postsBlog biography

Sushil Kuner is a London-based principal associate who advises on all aspects of financial services regulatory law, having spent eight years working within the Supervision and Enforcement Divisions of the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA).

  • Sushil Kuner
    https://loupedin.blog/author/sushilkuner/
    Ethical implications posed by the Metaverse
  • Sushil Kuner
    https://loupedin.blog/author/sushilkuner/
    The CDEI reports on the use of data and AI in financial services
  • Sushil Kuner
    https://loupedin.blog/author/sushilkuner/
    Using Machine Learning in Financial Services and the regulatory implications

Sushil Kuner

Sushil Kuner is a London-based principal associate who advises on all aspects of financial services regulatory law, having spent eight years working within the Supervision and Enforcement Divisions of the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA).

Filed Under: Analysis, News Tagged With: Employment, financial services regulation

Views expressed in this blog do not necessarily reflect those of Gowling WLG.

NOT LEGAL ADVICE. Information made available on this website in any form is for information purposes only. It is not, and should not be taken as, legal advice. You should not rely on, or take or fail to take any action based upon this information. Never disregard professional legal advice or delay in seeking legal advice because of something you have read on this website. Gowling WLG professionals will be pleased to discuss resolutions to specific legal concerns you may have.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • UPC’s first decision concerning a second medical use patent
  • Sole(ly) aesthetic? The Birkenstock Sandal goes to the Federal Court of Justice
  • UK Litigation Funding: reform or retain?

Tags

Artificial Intelligence (AI) (62) Autonomous vehicles (11) b2022 (19) Birmingham 2022 (8) Birmingham 2022 Commonwealth Games (15) Brexit (23) Climate change (16) Collective defined contribution (6) COP26 (11) Copyright (11) COVID-19 (23) Cyber security (7) Data protection (8) Defined contribution (7) Dispute Resolution (14) Employment (14) employment law (11) Environment (18) Environmental Societal Governance (9) ESG (50) ESG and pensions (11) General Election 2024 and pensions (8) Intellectual Property (87) IP (10) Life sciences (7) litigation funding (8) net zero (6) Patents (41) Pensions (53) Pension Schemes Act 2021 (11) Pensions dashboards (7) Pensions in 2022 (10) Pensions law (43) Procurement (7) Public Law & Regulation (39) Real Estate (27) Retail (8) sustainability (21) Tech (58) The Week In Pensions (11) Trademarks (16) UK (15) unified patents court (9) UPC (40) Week in HR (8)

Categories

Archives

Gowling WLG is an international law firm comprising the members of Gowling WLG International Limited, an English Company Limited by Guarantee, and their respective affiliates. Each member and affiliate is an autonomous and independent entity. Gowling WLG International Limited promotes, facilitates and co-ordinates the activities of its members but does not itself provide services to clients. Our structure is explained in more detail on our Legal Information page.

Footer

  • Home
  • About
  • Gowling WLG
  • Legal information
  • Privacy statement
  • Cookie Policy

© 2025 Gowling WLG