• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
  • Gowling WLG
  • Legal information
  • Privacy statement
  • Cookie Policy
  • Home
  • About
  • Posts
  • Blogs
    • B2022
    • The IP Blog
    • Public Law & Regulation
    • AI
    • The Unified Patents Court

LoupedIn

Practicable tips for trade secret protection during litigation in Germany

November 16, 2021, Gowling WLG

Practicable tips for trade secret protection during litigation in Germany

The Trade Secret Act (GeschGehG) covers information that has a certain economic value, such as profit and sales figures, but also technical know-how. According to Sec. 2 No. 1 GeschGehG, this information is only protected as business secrets as long as it is, firstly, not generally known or readily accessible, secondly, is the subject of the circumstances according to appropriate confidentiality measures and, thirdly, a legitimate interest in the secrecy exists.

This sometimes leads to a dilemma in commercial litigation proceedings. In order to defend against the allegation of patent infringement, for example, it must be demonstrated and, if necessary, proven that the contested embodiment does not infringe the patent, which could make it necessary to submit construction drawings. In trademark infringement proceedings, a defence against the trademark in suit is that it is not used at all or that it has no distinctive character, which requires the plaintiff and counter-defendant to submit sales figures or information about the advertising expenditure so as not to lose the trademark in addition to the process.

 In copyright law, on the other hand, it can only be proven by submitting the source code to prove that software does not infringe the copyright.

If one of the parties decides to meet its burden of proof, it will lose its trade secret, because:

  • court hearings are public. That means, when the evidence is discussed, the information that is actually required to be kept secret becomes known to the public present.
  • the information that is actually to be kept secret finds its way into the court files, which in turn are fundamentally the subject of claims under the freedom of information laws.
  • the evidence is also passed on to the other party – which can result in an enormous gain in knowledge for them, which is sometimes more important than a won trial.

So what to do? Leave it be and rather protect trade secrets then take action against infringers?

There is a solution: “Appropriate confidentiality measures”, like

  • requesting the partial exclusion of the public
  • marking the trade secret as such (in the explanations on the trade secret in the written pleading as well as in the corresponding annex)
  • seeking to conclude a confidentiality agreement with all parties involved in the process

Further information on this topic are summarised in our article first published in German in the Intellectual Property Magazine.

For details on how to protect business secrets in the best possible way while also meeting the burden of presentation and proof, reach out to us.

About the author(s)

Gowling WLG
See recent postsBlog biography

Gowling WLG is an international law firm operating across an array of different sectors and services. Our LoupedIn blog aims to give readers industry insight, technical knowledge and thoughtful observations on the legal landscape and beyond.

  • Gowling WLG
    https://loupedin.blog/author/gowlingwlg/
    Ensuring the emerging geography of AI doesn’t become a TRAIN-wreck
  • Gowling WLG
    https://loupedin.blog/author/gowlingwlg/
    Celebrating Black History Month: Stories from our community
  • Gowling WLG
    https://loupedin.blog/author/gowlingwlg/
    No revocation carve-out and related actions – 2nd UPC decision on the merits
  • Gowling WLG
    https://loupedin.blog/author/gowlingwlg/
    The first UPC decision on the merits is here

Gowling WLG

Gowling WLG is an international law firm operating across an array of different sectors and services. Our LoupedIn blog aims to give readers industry insight, technical knowledge and thoughtful observations on the legal landscape and beyond.

Filed Under: Analysis, Intellectual Property Tagged With: Dispute Resolution, Germany, Intellectual Property, IP, IP litigation, trade secrets

Views expressed in this blog do not necessarily reflect those of Gowling WLG.

NOT LEGAL ADVICE. Information made available on this website in any form is for information purposes only. It is not, and should not be taken as, legal advice. You should not rely on, or take or fail to take any action based upon this information. Never disregard professional legal advice or delay in seeking legal advice because of something you have read on this website. Gowling WLG professionals will be pleased to discuss resolutions to specific legal concerns you may have.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Driving change: £2.6 billion boost for UK automotive sector in 2025 Spending Review
  • UPC’s first decision concerning a second medical use patent
  • Sole(ly) aesthetic? The Birkenstock Sandal goes to the Federal Court of Justice

Tags

Artificial Intelligence (AI) (62) Autonomous vehicles (11) b2022 (19) Birmingham 2022 (8) Birmingham 2022 Commonwealth Games (15) Brexit (23) Climate change (16) Collective defined contribution (6) COP26 (11) Copyright (11) COVID-19 (23) Cyber security (7) Data protection (8) Defined contribution (7) Dispute Resolution (14) Employment (14) employment law (11) Environment (18) Environmental Societal Governance (9) ESG (50) ESG and pensions (11) General Election 2024 and pensions (8) Intellectual Property (87) IP (10) Life sciences (7) litigation funding (8) net zero (6) Patents (41) Pensions (53) Pension Schemes Act 2021 (11) Pensions dashboards (7) Pensions in 2022 (10) Pensions law (43) Procurement (7) Public Law & Regulation (39) Real Estate (27) Retail (8) sustainability (21) Tech (58) The Week In Pensions (11) Trademarks (16) UK (15) unified patents court (9) UPC (40) Week in HR (8)

Categories

Archives

Gowling WLG is an international law firm comprising the members of Gowling WLG International Limited, an English Company Limited by Guarantee, and their respective affiliates. Each member and affiliate is an autonomous and independent entity. Gowling WLG International Limited promotes, facilitates and co-ordinates the activities of its members but does not itself provide services to clients. Our structure is explained in more detail on our Legal Information page.

Footer

  • Home
  • About
  • Gowling WLG
  • Legal information
  • Privacy statement
  • Cookie Policy

© 2025 Gowling WLG