• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
  • Gowling WLG
  • Legal information
  • Privacy statement
  • Cookie Policy
  • Home
  • About
  • Posts
  • Blogs
    • B2022
    • The IP Blog
    • Public Law & Regulation
    • AI
    • The Unified Patents Court

LoupedIn

Public procurement: Using the updated Standard Selection Questionnaire, mandatory from 1 April 2023

April 5, 2023, Christopher Brennan and 

Public procurement: Using the updated Standard Selection Questionnaire, mandatory from 1 April 2023

All contracting authorities in England, and contracting authorities in Wales and Northern Ireland that exercise wholly or mainly reserved functions, should now use the Crown Commercial Service’s updated Standard Selection questionnaire (SQ), published with Procurement Policy Note 03/23, when undertaking above-threshold procurements within Part 2 of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015[1].  Use of the updated standard SQ is mandatory as from 1 April.

PPN 03/23, and the updated SQ, replace Procurement Policy Note 08/16 and the original standard SQ published with that PPN. The update makes several important changes to the SQ and its questions, and also contains revised statutory guidance under Regulation 107 of the PCR – reflecting a number of key legal and policy updates.

Following the UK’s exit from the EU, PPN 03/23 also replaces the “European Single Procurement Document” (ESPD) with the “Single Procurement Document” (SPD), under Regulation 59 of the PCR. In addition, there have been changes to Regulation 57 of the PCR (grounds for exclusion), and the standard SQ’s updates also reflect these.

The updated SQ includes several new or updated question sets reflecting current procurement policy (health and safety, supply chains, data protection, modern slavery, carbon emissions, and payment). It also includes updated guidance (Annex A) on key aspects of the SQ and its use, including self-declarations in relation to the exclusion grounds and reliance on other entities to demonstrate economic and financial standing and technical/professional ability. The guidance helps clarify what is meant by “reliance” on other entities in this respect. Mandatory and optional questions for inclusion in the SQ are in Annex B, and the Single Procurement Document is set out at Annex C. The exclusion grounds are set out for convenience in Annex D.

For more information please get in touch with a member of our Public Procurement team.


[1] The PPN asks contracting authorities to use the Common Assessment Standard (CAS) or PAS91, in place of the standard SQ, for works contracts – including the procurement of mixed contracts that include supplies and services.

About the author(s)

Photo of Christopher Brennan
Christopher Brennan
Legal Director at Gowling WLG | View Profile |  See recent postsBlog biography

Chris is a leading lawyer in public procurement. He brings nearly two decades of experience in procurement across diverse sectors including central and local government, construction, developments and infrastructure, defence, health, education, the regulated industries and utilities.

  • Christopher Brennan
    https://loupedin.blog/author/christopherbrennan/
    Some important and immediate changes to the public procurement regime, effective immediately
  • Christopher Brennan
    https://loupedin.blog/author/christopherbrennan/
    Public procurement reform: Procurement Bill update
  • Christopher Brennan
    https://loupedin.blog/author/christopherbrennan/
    New year, new values: Public procurement thresholds in place from 1 January 2022
  • Christopher Brennan
    https://loupedin.blog/author/christopherbrennan/
    T(hresholds!) minus two weeks and counting:

Filed Under: News Tagged With: Government contracting & public sector, public sector

Views expressed in this blog do not necessarily reflect those of Gowling WLG.

NOT LEGAL ADVICE. Information made available on this website in any form is for information purposes only. It is not, and should not be taken as, legal advice. You should not rely on, or take or fail to take any action based upon this information. Never disregard professional legal advice or delay in seeking legal advice because of something you have read on this website. Gowling WLG professionals will be pleased to discuss resolutions to specific legal concerns you may have.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Sole(ly) aesthetic? The Birkenstock Sandal goes to the Federal Court of Justice
  • UK Litigation Funding: reform or retain?
  • Arbitration Act 2025 receives Royal Assent

Tags

Artificial Intelligence (AI) (62) Autonomous vehicles (11) b2022 (19) Birmingham 2022 (8) Birmingham 2022 Commonwealth Games (15) Brexit (23) Climate change (16) Collective defined contribution (6) COP26 (11) Copyright (11) COVID-19 (23) Cyber security (7) Data protection (8) Defined contribution (7) Dispute Resolution (14) Employment (14) employment law (11) Environment (18) Environmental Societal Governance (9) ESG (50) ESG and pensions (11) General Election 2024 and pensions (8) Intellectual Property (86) IP (10) Life sciences (7) litigation funding (8) net zero (6) Patents (40) Pensions (53) Pension Schemes Act 2021 (11) Pensions dashboards (7) Pensions in 2022 (10) Pensions law (43) Procurement (7) Public Law & Regulation (39) Real Estate (27) Retail (8) sustainability (21) Tech (58) The Week In Pensions (11) Trademarks (16) UK (15) unified patents court (9) UPC (39) Week in HR (8)

Categories

Archives

Gowling WLG is an international law firm comprising the members of Gowling WLG International Limited, an English Company Limited by Guarantee, and their respective affiliates. Each member and affiliate is an autonomous and independent entity. Gowling WLG International Limited promotes, facilitates and co-ordinates the activities of its members but does not itself provide services to clients. Our structure is explained in more detail on our Legal Information page.

Footer

  • Home
  • About
  • Gowling WLG
  • Legal information
  • Privacy statement
  • Cookie Policy

© 2025 Gowling WLG