• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
  • Gowling WLG
  • Legal information
  • Privacy statement
  • Cookie Policy
  • Home
  • About
  • Posts
  • Blogs
    • B2022
    • The IP Blog
    • Public Law & Regulation
    • AI
    • The Unified Patents Court

LoupedIn

The first UPC decision on the merits is here

July 4, 2024, Gowling WLG

The first UPC decision on the merits is here

The Düsseldorf LD issued the first UPC decision on the merits (LD, Düsseldorf, Franz Kaldewei GmbH & Co. KG v. Bette GmbH & Co. KG, 3 July 2024, UPC_CFI_7/2023).

This decision finds that in the targeted UPC states (AU, BE, DK, FR, IT, LU, NL) the patent as granted is revoked but the patent as per the auxiliary request filed by the claimant is valid and infringed.

Infringement was found on a direct and indirect basis.

Key takeaways:

  • There is an informative explanation of the reasoning behind the structure of the decision.
  • Inventive step is assessed by using the problem-solution approach –although without explicit reference. Validity as per the auxiliary request is assessed as a second step, once the patent as granted has been revoked.
  • Prior use defence to infringement must be demonstrated on
    country-by-country basis.
  • Direct infringement found, even in the absence of direct sales, as the offer for sale of infringing products is made on the Internet website of the defendant, referring to local distributors.
  • Indirect infringement requires double territoriality in that the offer and/or
    delivery must take place in a contracting member state and must be aimed at use of the invention in a contracting member state. Indirect infringement was found in all targeted contracting member states as the infringing products could be purchased by customers in those states.
  • In both types of infringement, Germany was not targeted by the permanent injunction request.
  • Injunction, withdrawal, recall of infringing products and communication of
    information ordered under penalty fines, as well as EUR 10,000 provisional
    damages. Final damages to be applied after the stage of the communication of information.
  • Costs of the claim split equally for the revocation counterclaim but not for the infringement action (claimant to bear 15% and defendant to bear 85%).

However, the operative part of the decision referring to added subject-matter appears not to be aligned with the reasoning of the decision.

Gowling WLG

Gowling WLG is an international law firm operating across an array of different sectors and services. Our LoupedIn blog aims to give readers industry insight, technical knowledge and thoughtful observations on the legal landscape and beyond.

Filed Under: News, The Unified Patents Court Tagged With: Patents, UPC

Views expressed in this blog do not necessarily reflect those of Gowling WLG.

NOT LEGAL ADVICE. Information made available on this website in any form is for information purposes only. It is not, and should not be taken as, legal advice. You should not rely on, or take or fail to take any action based upon this information. Never disregard professional legal advice or delay in seeking legal advice because of something you have read on this website. Gowling WLG professionals will be pleased to discuss resolutions to specific legal concerns you may have.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • UPC’s first decision concerning a second medical use patent
  • Sole(ly) aesthetic? The Birkenstock Sandal goes to the Federal Court of Justice
  • UK Litigation Funding: reform or retain?

Tags

Artificial Intelligence (AI) (62) Autonomous vehicles (11) b2022 (19) Birmingham 2022 (8) Birmingham 2022 Commonwealth Games (15) Brexit (23) Climate change (16) Collective defined contribution (6) COP26 (11) Copyright (11) COVID-19 (23) Cyber security (7) Data protection (8) Defined contribution (7) Dispute Resolution (14) Employment (14) employment law (11) Environment (18) Environmental Societal Governance (9) ESG (50) ESG and pensions (11) General Election 2024 and pensions (8) Intellectual Property (87) IP (10) Life sciences (7) litigation funding (8) net zero (6) Patents (41) Pensions (53) Pension Schemes Act 2021 (11) Pensions dashboards (7) Pensions in 2022 (10) Pensions law (43) Procurement (7) Public Law & Regulation (39) Real Estate (27) Retail (8) sustainability (21) Tech (58) The Week In Pensions (11) Trademarks (16) UK (15) unified patents court (9) UPC (40) Week in HR (8)

Categories

Archives

Gowling WLG is an international law firm comprising the members of Gowling WLG International Limited, an English Company Limited by Guarantee, and their respective affiliates. Each member and affiliate is an autonomous and independent entity. Gowling WLG International Limited promotes, facilitates and co-ordinates the activities of its members but does not itself provide services to clients. Our structure is explained in more detail on our Legal Information page.

Footer

  • Home
  • About
  • Gowling WLG
  • Legal information
  • Privacy statement
  • Cookie Policy

© 2025 Gowling WLG