• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
  • Gowling WLG
  • Legal information
  • Privacy statement
  • Cookie Policy
  • Home
  • About
  • Posts
  • Blogs
    • B2022
    • The IP Blog
    • Public Law & Regulation
    • AI
    • The Unified Patents Court

LoupedIn

UPC Court of Appeal denies liability of Belkin’s managing directors as intermediaries for patent infringement – Partial suspensive effect of the appeal granted

December 4, 2024, Marianne Schaffner, Mathilde Grammont and Charlotte Chambon

UPC Court of Appeal denies liability of Belkin’s managing directors as intermediaries for patent infringement – Partial suspensive effect of the appeal granted

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

On 13 September 2024, the Munich Local Division (LD) granted a permanent injunction based on a standard essential patent (SEP) against Belkin and several of its corporate officers.

Belkin appealed this decision and filed an application for suspensive effect according to Article 74 UPCA and RoP 223.

On 29 October 2024, the UPC Court of Appeal (CoA) suspended the effects of the order of 13 September 2024 towards Belkin’s corporate officers, considering that the Munich LD made a blatant error in law.

Key takeaways:

  • The CoA refers to its caselaw reminding that if appeals do not have suspensive effect, the CoA can decide otherwise in particular if the order which is appealed holds manifestly erroneous.
  • Belkin’s corporate officers had been held intermediaries under the meaning of Article 63(1) UPCA, but the CoA decides that as they represent the company they are not “third parties” to Belkin, held liable for infringement.
  • The CoA therefore concludes that Munich LD has made a manifest error of law in finding the corporate officers infringers of the enforced patent, which justifies maintaining the statu quo prior to the order until the appeal is decided.
  • Suspensive effect of the appeal is therefore granted only in consideration of the enforcement of the order of 13 September 2024 against the corporate officers whilst the order remains provisionally enforceable towards other parties.

About the author(s)

Photo of Marianne Schaffner
Marianne Schaffner
Partner at Gowling WLG |  See recent postsBlog biography

Marianne is an Intellectual Property lawyer in Paris. She is a recognised trial lawyer in national pan-European and international patent, trademark, and trade secrets disputes in the electronics and telecommunications, pharmaceutical, chemistry, and consumer products sectors.

  • Marianne Schaffner
    https://loupedin.blog/author/marianneschaffner/
    UPC has jurisdiction over actions for damages following a decision issued by national courts
  • Marianne Schaffner
    https://loupedin.blog/author/marianneschaffner/
    UPC’s first injunction concerning a Standard Essential Patent
  • Marianne Schaffner
    https://loupedin.blog/author/marianneschaffner/
    Stay of UPC revocation proceedings pending a national decision on validity of identical patent: Related actions
  • Marianne Schaffner
    https://loupedin.blog/author/marianneschaffner/
    CJEU decision on deceptivity of a trademark
Photo of Mathilde Grammont
Mathilde Grammont
Senior Associate at Gowling WLG |  See recent postsBlog biography

Mathilde is an intellectual property senior associate, who focuses her practice in multiple areas, including patents, trademarks, designs, trade secrets, copyright, both in litigation and non-litigation matters.

  • Mathilde Grammont
    https://loupedin.blog/author/mathildegrammont/
    UPC has jurisdiction over actions for damages following a decision issued by national courts
  • Mathilde Grammont
    https://loupedin.blog/author/mathildegrammont/
    UPC’s first injunction concerning a Standard Essential Patent
  • Mathilde Grammont
    https://loupedin.blog/author/mathildegrammont/
    Stay of UPC revocation proceedings pending a national decision on validity of identical patent: Related actions
  • Mathilde Grammont
    https://loupedin.blog/author/mathildegrammont/
    CJEU decision on deceptivity of a trademark
Charlotte Chambon
Charlotte Chambon
Associate at Gowling WLG | View Profile |  See recent postsBlog biography

Charlotte is an Associate and UPC Representative based in Gowling WLG's France office.

  • Charlotte Chambon
    https://loupedin.blog/author/charlottechambon/
    UPC’s first injunction concerning a Standard Essential Patent
  • Charlotte Chambon
    https://loupedin.blog/author/charlottechambon/
    Order from the Court of Appeal of the UPC: Suspension of the First instance injunction as Ireland is not a contracting member state

Marianne Schaffner, Mathilde Grammont and Charlotte Chambon

Filed Under: Blogs, Intellectual Property, Uncategorized Tagged With: Court of Appeal, Intellectual Property, Intermediaryliability, patent, Patent litigation, Permanent injunction -, Suspensive effect of appeal -, Unifiedpatentcourt, UPC

Views expressed in this blog do not necessarily reflect those of Gowling WLG.

NOT LEGAL ADVICE. Information made available on this website in any form is for information purposes only. It is not, and should not be taken as, legal advice. You should not rely on, or take or fail to take any action based upon this information. Never disregard professional legal advice or delay in seeking legal advice because of something you have read on this website. Gowling WLG professionals will be pleased to discuss resolutions to specific legal concerns you may have.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Sole(ly) aesthetic? The Birkenstock Sandal goes to the Federal Court of Justice
  • UK Litigation Funding: reform or retain?
  • Arbitration Act 2025 receives Royal Assent

Tags

Artificial Intelligence (AI) (62) Autonomous vehicles (11) b2022 (19) Birmingham 2022 (8) Birmingham 2022 Commonwealth Games (15) Brexit (23) Climate change (16) Collective defined contribution (6) COP26 (11) Copyright (11) COVID-19 (23) Cyber security (7) Data protection (8) Defined contribution (7) Dispute Resolution (14) Employment (14) employment law (11) Environment (18) Environmental Societal Governance (9) ESG (50) ESG and pensions (11) General Election 2024 and pensions (8) Intellectual Property (86) IP (10) Life sciences (7) litigation funding (8) net zero (6) Patents (40) Pensions (53) Pension Schemes Act 2021 (11) Pensions dashboards (7) Pensions in 2022 (10) Pensions law (43) Procurement (7) Public Law & Regulation (39) Real Estate (27) Retail (8) sustainability (21) Tech (58) The Week In Pensions (11) Trademarks (16) UK (15) unified patents court (9) UPC (39) Week in HR (8)

Categories

Archives

Gowling WLG is an international law firm comprising the members of Gowling WLG International Limited, an English Company Limited by Guarantee, and their respective affiliates. Each member and affiliate is an autonomous and independent entity. Gowling WLG International Limited promotes, facilitates and co-ordinates the activities of its members but does not itself provide services to clients. Our structure is explained in more detail on our Legal Information page.

Footer

  • Home
  • About
  • Gowling WLG
  • Legal information
  • Privacy statement
  • Cookie Policy

© 2025 Gowling WLG