• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
  • Gowling WLG
  • Legal information
  • Privacy statement
  • Cookie Policy
  • Home
  • About
  • Posts
  • Blogs
    • B2022
    • The IP Blog
    • Public Law & Regulation
    • AI
    • The UPC Blog

LoupedIn

UK CDEI publishes review of bias in algorithmic decision-making

Published on November 27, 2020 by Matt Hervey

UK CDEI publishes review of bias in algorithmic decision-making

The UK’s Centre for Data Ethics and Innovation (CDEI) has published its Review into bias in algorithmic decision-making, calling for “active steps to anticipate risks and measure outcomes” and highlighting “the urgent need for the world to do better in using algorithms in the right way: to promote fairness, not undermine it”.

The CDEI notes that an “explosion in the volumes of available data” and “the increasing sophistication and accessibility of machine learning algorithms” may enable unprecedented opportunities to detect and measure bias. But it also recognises that bias may worsen, noting that “new forms of decision-making have surfaced numerous examples where algorithms have entrenched or amplified historic biases; or even created new forms of bias or unfairness.”

The key overarching recommendations are that:

  • “Organisational leaders need to be clear that they retain accountability for decisions made by their organisations, regardless of whether an algorithm or a team of humans is making those decisions on a day-to-day basis.”
  • “Senior decision-makers in organisations need to engage with understanding the trade-offs inherent in introducing an algorithm. They should expect and demand sufficient explainability of how an algorithm works so that they can make informed decisions on how to balance risks and opportunities as they deploy it into a decision-making process.”
  • “Regulators and industry bodies need to work together with wider society to agree best practice within their industry and establish … clear standards for anticipating and monitoring bias, for auditing algorithms and for addressing problems.”
  • “Fundamental decisions about what is fair cannot be left to data scientists alone. They are decisions that can only be truly legitimate if society agrees and accepts them.”

In short, bias in AI needs action by companies’ leaders and senior decision-makers, regulators and Parliament.

For a discussion of the Review’s findings on the thorny issue of AI, bias and recruitment, see this post by my colleague and employment law expert, Jonathan Chamberlain.

About the author(s)

Photo of Matt Hervey
Matt Hervey
See recent posts

Matt Hervey is Head of Artificial Intelligence (UK) at Gowling WLG (UK) and advises on Artificial Intelligence (AI) and IP across all sectors, including automotive, life sciences, finance and retail. Find out more about Matt Hervey on the Gowling WLG website. He is co-editor of The Law of Artificial Intelligence (Sweet & Maxwell).

  • Matt Hervey
    https://loupedin.blog/author/matthervey/
    USPTO denies patent application for invention by AI
  • Matt Hervey
    https://loupedin.blog/author/matthervey/
    The UKIPO investigates AI-powered prior art searches
  • Matt Hervey
    https://loupedin.blog/author/matthervey/
    The UKIPO launches AI-powered assessments of trademark applications
  • Matt Hervey
    https://loupedin.blog/author/matthervey/
    AI in aviation: regulating autonomous flights

Matt Hervey

Matt Hervey is Head of Artificial Intelligence (UK) at Gowling WLG (UK) and advises on Artificial Intelligence (AI) and IP across all sectors, including automotive, life sciences, finance and retail. Find out more about Matt Hervey on the Gowling WLG website. He is co-editor of The Law of Artificial Intelligence (Sweet & Maxwell).

Filed Under: AI, Diversity, Public Law & Regulation Tagged With: Bias

Views expressed in this blog do not necessarily reflect those of Gowling WLG.

NOT LEGAL ADVICE. Information made available on this website in any form is for information purposes only. It is not, and should not be taken as, legal advice. You should not rely on, or take or fail to take any action based upon this information. Never disregard professional legal advice or delay in seeking legal advice because of something you have read on this website. Gowling WLG professionals will be pleased to discuss resolutions to specific legal concerns you may have.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Copyright in the outputs of generative AI
  • Crossing the finish line: My apprenticeship journey
  • Environmental law in 2023 – Key areas to follow

Tags

Artificial Intelligence (AI) (52) Autonomous vehicles (11) b2022 (18) Birmingham 2022 (8) Birmingham 2022 Commonwealth Games (14) Blockchain (4) brand protection (5) Brexit (23) china (5) Climate change (12) COP26 (11) COP27 (5) Copyright (8) COVID-19 (23) Cyber security (5) Data protection (6) Employment (13) employment law (9) Environment (8) ESG (21) ESG and pensions (9) GowlingAtTheGames (5) Intellectual Property (57) IP (9) Life sciences (6) net zero (6) Patents (28) Pensions (39) Pension scams (5) Pension Schemes Act 2021 (10) Pensions dashboards (6) Pensions in 2022 (10) Pensions law (30) Procurement (7) Public Law & Regulation (39) Real Estate (16) Retail (6) sustainability (7) Tech (42) The Week In Pensions (11) Trademarks (12) UK (15) unified patents court (9) UPC (24) Week in HR (8)

Categories

Archives

Gowling WLG is an international law firm comprising the members of Gowling WLG International Limited, an English Company Limited by Guarantee, and their respective affiliates. Each member and affiliate is an autonomous and independent entity. Gowling WLG International Limited promotes, facilitates and co-ordinates the activities of its members but does not itself provide services to clients. Our structure is explained in more detail on our Legal Information page.

Footer

LoupedIn is the Official Gowling WLG Blog. Gowling WLG is an international law firm comprising the members of Gowling WLG International Limited, an English Company Limited by Guarantee, and their respective affiliates. Each member and affiliate is an autonomous and independent entity. Gowling WLG International Limited promotes, facilitates and co-ordinates the activities of its members but does not itself provide services to clients. Our structure is explained in more detail on our Legal Information page.

  • Home
  • About
  • Gowling WLG
  • Legal information
  • Privacy statement
  • Cookie Policy

© 2023 Gowling WLG

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT