• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
  • Gowling WLG
  • Legal information
  • Privacy statement
  • Cookie Policy
  • Home
  • About
  • Posts
  • Blogs
    • B2022
    • The IP Blog
    • Public Law & Regulation
    • AI
    • The Unified Patents Court

LoupedIn

UK public procurement: Poor payers may find it harder to win government contracts

December 15, 2021, Christopher Brennan

UK public procurement: Poor payers may find it harder to win government contracts

A look at Procurement Policy Note 08/21

Background

  • Procurement Policy Note (PPN) 08/21 has been published by the Cabinet Office to encourage bidders in central government contracts to pay their supply chain promptly.
  • This PPN increases the threshold introduced by last year’s PPN 07/20, which PPN 08/21 replaces, that bidders must meet to demonstrate that they have effective payment systems in place to ensure the reliability of their supply chains. The goal is to reduce instances of delayed payments and resulting supply chain disruption.

Applicability

  • PPN 08/21 applies:
    • to all Central Government Departments, their Executive Agencies and Non Departmental Public Bodies (referred to as In-Scope Organisations);
    • when procuring goods and/or services and/or works with an anticipated contract value above £5 million per annum (averaged over the life of the contract); and
    • on or after 1 April 2022.
  • The scope of application is narrower than last year’s PPN 07/20 because it does not include  NHS trusts or contracting authorities whose functions are devolved or mainly devolved functions of Scotland, Wales or Northern Ireland.

Mechanism

  • From 1 April 2022, the standard selection questionnaire submitted by bidders on all relevant procurements will include a set of additional questions prescribed by Appendix A of the guidance to PPN 08/21.These questions must be added as sub-questions to question 6.2 of the questionnaire. The guidance also provides a template pass/fail evaluation methodology for each of the questions. The questions assess whether a bidder has paid its suppliers in accordance with the terms it has applied, and whether payment has been prompt (95% of invoices within 60 days is considered prompt overall).
  • These questions are essentially not new, and similar questions previously formed part of the standard selection questionnaire – but PPN 08/21 increases their stringency.

Criteria

From 1 April 2022, in all relevant procurements:

  • Bidders must demonstrate that they have paid 95% or more of all supply chain invoices within 60 days in at least one of the last two (six month long) reporting periods. (This part of the assessment has not changed since 2020.); and
  • If bidders fail to meet this standard, they may still pass if they have paid between 90% and 95% of their supply chain invoices within 60 days in at least one of the previous two reporting periods, and they submit an action plan identifying why the threshold was not met and their intended rectification steps. This is more stringent than the previous lower threshold of 85%.

The bottom line

  • Bidders must be asked to provide evidence allowing verification that they meet the required selection criteria, unless the authority can access it free of charge from a national database. If a bidder has failed to pay at least 90% of its supply chain invoices within 60 days in at least one of the previous two reporting periods, they are unlikely to be allowed to bid – unless exceptional circumstances render the requirement irrelevant or disproportionate in a given case.

About the author(s)

Photo of Christopher Brennan
Christopher Brennan
Legal Director at Gowling WLG | View Profile |  See recent postsBlog biography

Chris is a leading lawyer in public procurement. He brings nearly two decades of experience in procurement across diverse sectors including central and local government, construction, developments and infrastructure, defence, health, education, the regulated industries and utilities.

  • Christopher Brennan
    https://loupedin.blog/author/christopherbrennan/
    Some important and immediate changes to the public procurement regime, effective immediately
  • Christopher Brennan
    https://loupedin.blog/author/christopherbrennan/
    Public procurement: Using the updated Standard Selection Questionnaire, mandatory from 1 April 2023
  • Christopher Brennan
    https://loupedin.blog/author/christopherbrennan/
    Public procurement reform: Procurement Bill update
  • Christopher Brennan
    https://loupedin.blog/author/christopherbrennan/
    New year, new values: Public procurement thresholds in place from 1 January 2022

Christopher Brennan

Chris is a leading lawyer in public procurement. He brings nearly two decades of experience in procurement across diverse sectors including central and local government, construction, developments and infrastructure, defence, health, education, the regulated industries and utilities.

Filed Under: Blogs Tagged With: Brexit, Contract, Government, Policy, Procurement, Public, Public Procurement

Views expressed in this blog do not necessarily reflect those of Gowling WLG.

NOT LEGAL ADVICE. Information made available on this website in any form is for information purposes only. It is not, and should not be taken as, legal advice. You should not rely on, or take or fail to take any action based upon this information. Never disregard professional legal advice or delay in seeking legal advice because of something you have read on this website. Gowling WLG professionals will be pleased to discuss resolutions to specific legal concerns you may have.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Driving change: £2.6 billion boost for UK automotive sector in 2025 Spending Review
  • UPC’s first decision concerning a second medical use patent
  • Sole(ly) aesthetic? The Birkenstock Sandal goes to the Federal Court of Justice

Tags

Artificial Intelligence (AI) (62) Autonomous vehicles (11) b2022 (19) Birmingham 2022 (8) Birmingham 2022 Commonwealth Games (15) Brexit (23) Climate change (16) Collective defined contribution (6) COP26 (11) Copyright (11) COVID-19 (23) Cyber security (7) Data protection (8) Defined contribution (7) Dispute Resolution (14) Employment (14) employment law (11) Environment (18) Environmental Societal Governance (9) ESG (50) ESG and pensions (11) General Election 2024 and pensions (8) Intellectual Property (87) IP (10) Life sciences (7) litigation funding (8) net zero (6) Patents (41) Pensions (53) Pension Schemes Act 2021 (11) Pensions dashboards (7) Pensions in 2022 (10) Pensions law (43) Procurement (7) Public Law & Regulation (39) Real Estate (27) Retail (8) sustainability (21) Tech (58) The Week In Pensions (11) Trademarks (16) UK (15) unified patents court (9) UPC (40) Week in HR (8)

Categories

Archives

Gowling WLG is an international law firm comprising the members of Gowling WLG International Limited, an English Company Limited by Guarantee, and their respective affiliates. Each member and affiliate is an autonomous and independent entity. Gowling WLG International Limited promotes, facilitates and co-ordinates the activities of its members but does not itself provide services to clients. Our structure is explained in more detail on our Legal Information page.

Footer

  • Home
  • About
  • Gowling WLG
  • Legal information
  • Privacy statement
  • Cookie Policy

© 2025 Gowling WLG