• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
  • Gowling WLG
  • Legal information
  • Privacy statement
  • Cookie Policy
  • Home
  • About
  • Posts
  • Blogs
    • B2022
    • The IP Blog
    • Public Law & Regulation
    • AI
    • The Unified Patents Court

LoupedIn

October 26, 2022, Jian Xu

What are the legal grounds for domain name disputes in China?

Domain name piracy is as common as trademark squatting in China. The key to striking down domain name piracy is to determine that the domain name is registered in bad faith which either infringes a prior right or constitutes unfair competition behavior. In connection with this, the Chinese court has issued the following opinion.

“When trying a Domain Name Dispute Case, the people’s court should determine that the defendant’s registration and/or use, etc. of a domain name constitutes infringement or unfair competition if each of the following criteria is satisfied:

  • the civil rights or interests for which the claimant seeks protection are legitimate and effective;
  • the defendant’s domain name or its main part constitutes a copy, imitation, translation, or transliteration of a well-known trademark of the claimant; or it is identical with or similar to a registered trademark, domain name, etc. of the claimant to a degree sufficient to cause mistaken identification among the relevant public;
  • the defendant does not enjoy rights to or interests in the domain name or its main part, and has no justification to register and/or use the domain name; and
  • the defendant’s registration and/or use of the domain name is in bad faith.”

According to the above guidelines, the court shall determine the defendant acted in bad faith for the following conduct.

  • for commercial purposes, registering another’s well-known trademark as a domain name;
  • for commercial purposes, registering and/or using a domain name that is the same as or similar to the claimant’s registered trademark, domain name, etc., and deliberately causing confusion with the products and/or services provided by the claimant or with the claimant’s website in order to mislead network users into accessing one’s own website or another online site;
  • having offered to sell, lease or otherwise transfer the domain name at a high price and obtained unfair benefits;
  • the defendant neither uses nor intends to use the domain name after registration, but intentionally prevents the registration of the domain name by the person holding rights therein; and
  • other situations involving bad faith.”

However, if the defendant produces evidence that the domain name it/he owns has gained a certain degree of reputation before the dispute occurs, and is distinct from the claimant’s registered trademark, domain names, etc., then the defendant will be exempted from bad faith.

If the court decides that the registration of the domain name is in bad faith which infringes prior rights or constitutes unfair competition, the court can order the defendant to stop infringement, cancel the domain name, or transfer the domain name to the claimant. Damages can be obtained if actual harm is caused to the claimant.

About the author(s)

Jian Xu
See recent postsBlog biography

Dr. Jian Xu is an internationally recognized China intellectual property expert. He is the Managing Director and Head of IP Prosecution of Gowling WLG Beijing. He has been a dually qualified Chinese lawyer and patent/trademark attorney since 2006 and has handled all aspects of IP in China.

  • Jian Xu
    https://loupedin.blog/author/jian-xu/
    What to do when you receive spam emails like “your brand has been registered!”?
  • Jian Xu
    https://loupedin.blog/author/jian-xu/
    How to translate your trademark into Chinese?
  • Jian Xu
    https://loupedin.blog/author/jian-xu/
    Can patent terms be extended in China?
  • Jian Xu
    https://loupedin.blog/author/jian-xu/
    Six common problems caused by China’s trademark subclass system

Jian Xu

Dr. Jian Xu is an internationally recognized China intellectual property expert. He is the Managing Director and Head of IP Prosecution of Gowling WLG Beijing. He has been a dually qualified Chinese lawyer and patent/trademark attorney since 2006 and has handled all aspects of IP in China.

Filed Under: Intellectual Property Tagged With: china, IP, litigation

Views expressed in this blog do not necessarily reflect those of Gowling WLG.

NOT LEGAL ADVICE. Information made available on this website in any form is for information purposes only. It is not, and should not be taken as, legal advice. You should not rely on, or take or fail to take any action based upon this information. Never disregard professional legal advice or delay in seeking legal advice because of something you have read on this website. Gowling WLG professionals will be pleased to discuss resolutions to specific legal concerns you may have.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Sole(ly) aesthetic? The Birkenstock Sandal goes to the Federal Court of Justice
  • UK Litigation Funding: reform or retain?
  • Arbitration Act 2025 receives Royal Assent

Tags

Artificial Intelligence (AI) (62) Autonomous vehicles (11) b2022 (19) Birmingham 2022 (8) Birmingham 2022 Commonwealth Games (15) Brexit (23) Climate change (16) Collective defined contribution (6) COP26 (11) Copyright (11) COVID-19 (23) Cyber security (7) Data protection (8) Defined contribution (7) Dispute Resolution (14) Employment (14) employment law (11) Environment (18) Environmental Societal Governance (9) ESG (50) ESG and pensions (11) General Election 2024 and pensions (8) Intellectual Property (86) IP (10) Life sciences (7) litigation funding (8) net zero (6) Patents (40) Pensions (53) Pension Schemes Act 2021 (11) Pensions dashboards (7) Pensions in 2022 (10) Pensions law (43) Procurement (7) Public Law & Regulation (39) Real Estate (27) Retail (8) sustainability (21) Tech (58) The Week In Pensions (11) Trademarks (16) UK (15) unified patents court (9) UPC (39) Week in HR (8)

Categories

Archives

Gowling WLG is an international law firm comprising the members of Gowling WLG International Limited, an English Company Limited by Guarantee, and their respective affiliates. Each member and affiliate is an autonomous and independent entity. Gowling WLG International Limited promotes, facilitates and co-ordinates the activities of its members but does not itself provide services to clients. Our structure is explained in more detail on our Legal Information page.

Footer

  • Home
  • About
  • Gowling WLG
  • Legal information
  • Privacy statement
  • Cookie Policy

© 2025 Gowling WLG