• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
  • Gowling WLG
  • Legal information
  • Privacy statement
  • Cookie Policy
  • Home
  • About
  • Posts
  • Blogs
    • B2022
    • The IP Blog
    • Public Law & Regulation
    • AI
    • The Unified Patents Court

LoupedIn

The Unitary Patent System – Expectations, Challenges, preparation

April 26, 2023, Arnie Francis and Michael Carter

The Unitary Patent System – Expectations, Challenges, preparation

“Cautious optimism but unsold on the benefits” could be the summary of the Gowling WLG IP team 2022/2023 UPC survey findings. The research, conducted in late 2022 and early 2023, gathered the views of a wide demographic of the IP community. Respondents were drawn from in-house and private practice IP professionals spanning a range of industries and representing companies with patent portfolios ranging from a handful to more than 20,000.

The survey revealed that, despite numerous setbacks including delays, the impact of Brexit, as well as more recent issues relating to the Case Management System, there is a cautious optimism the UPC will be a success. However, this optimism needs to be viewed in context: only a modest proportion of respondents believe the new system will benefit their business and an average of 64% of existing European Patents are predicted to be opted out. Opt-outs have got off to a slow start, with only approximately 23,000 patents opted out so far, but are expected to accelerate as the opening date of 1st June 2023 approaches.


In some respects, the current tempered optimism surrounding the new system is within the control of the UPC itself. Responses to the survey make it clear the court will need to address several important points of law and procedure at an early stage if users are to have confidence in the system. Furthermore, respondents consider the quality and transparency of judgments, not costs, as the driving factor in deciding to bring proceedings before the UPC.


Attitudes might also shift once companies are better prepared. Responses indicate that, currently, a significant proportion of companies are seemingly unprepared for the new system and only 30% either have a settled strategy or are in the process of creating one. It therefore seems that a general ‘wait and see’ approach still persists – perhaps not surprising given the false starts the system has endured, but one that requires revisiting on the eve of what promises to be the biggest change in the European patent landscape for more than 50 years.


See the full analysis of our survey results here.


For more information on the UPC visit gowlingwlg.com/upc.

DO YOU THINK THE UPC AND UNITARY PATENT PACKAGE WILL BE A SUCCESS?

About the author(s)

Photo of Arnie Francis
Arnie Francis
Senior Associate at Gowling WLG |  See recent postsBlog biography

Arnie Francis is a senior associate in Gowling WLG's IP team. He is both a UK (2015) and European (2016) qualified patent attorney.

  • Arnie Francis
    The UPC: A status and progress update from Alexander Ramsay
  • Arnie Francis
    UPC Rules of Procedure approved – 19th time’s a charm
  • Arnie Francis
    Intellectual Property Enterprise Court increases cost caps in October 2022
  • Arnie Francis
    Start date of EPO’s transitional measures for obtaining Unitary Patents announced
  • Arnie Francis
    Leveraging the sunshine period starting March 2023
  • Arnie Francis
    The Unitary Patent System – Expectations, Challenges, preparation
Michael Carter
Michael Carter
Partner at Gowling WLG |  See recent postsBlog biography

Michael Carter is an experienced IP litigator and IP strategist with more than 12 years' experience of working with clients in the technology, engineering and automotive sectors to develop and implement their IP strategies and enforce their IP rights.

  • Michael Carter
    Who controls your opt-out?
  • Michael Carter
    The Unitary Patent System – Expectations, Challenges, preparation
  • Michael Carter
    Copyright ends the data rush: No mining for AI chatbots

Arnie Francis and Michael Carter

Filed Under: Blogs, The Unified Patents Court, Uncategorized Tagged With: Intellectual Property, Patents, Unitary Patent System, UPC, UPS

Views expressed in this blog do not necessarily reflect those of Gowling WLG.

NOT LEGAL ADVICE. Information made available on this website in any form is for information purposes only. It is not, and should not be taken as, legal advice. You should not rely on, or take or fail to take any action based upon this information. Never disregard professional legal advice or delay in seeking legal advice because of something you have read on this website. Gowling WLG professionals will be pleased to discuss resolutions to specific legal concerns you may have.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Biodiversity Net Gain – difficult decisions kicked into the long grass
  • Nature-based investment risks and opportunities for pension schemes
  • Copyright ends the data rush: No mining for AI chatbots

Tags

Artificial Intelligence (AI) (65) Autonomous vehicles (11) b2022 (19) Birmingham 2022 (8) Birmingham 2022 Commonwealth Games (15) Brexit (23) Climate change (18) Collective defined contribution (6) COP26 (11) Copyright (11) COVID-19 (23) Cyber security (7) Data protection (8) Defined contribution (7) Dispute Resolution (15) Employment (15) employment law (14) Environment (19) Environmental Societal Governance (9) ESG (55) ESG and pensions (13) General Election 2024 and pensions (8) Intellectual Property (89) IP (11) Life sciences (8) litigation funding (9) net zero (6) Patents (41) Pensions (54) Pension Schemes Act 2021 (11) Pensions dashboards (7) Pensions in 2022 (10) Pensions law (45) Procurement (7) Public Law & Regulation (39) Real Estate (28) Retail (8) sustainability (22) Tech (58) The Week In Pensions (11) Trademarks (16) UK (15) unified patents court (9) UPC (40) Week in HR (8)

Categories

Archives

Gowling WLG is an international law firm comprising the members of Gowling WLG International Limited, an English Company Limited by Guarantee, and their respective affiliates. Each member and affiliate is an autonomous and independent entity. Gowling WLG International Limited promotes, facilitates and co-ordinates the activities of its members but does not itself provide services to clients. Our structure is explained in more detail on our Legal Information page.

Footer

  • Home
  • About
  • Gowling WLG
  • Legal information
  • Privacy statement
  • Cookie Policy

© 2025 Gowling WLG