• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
  • Gowling WLG
  • Legal information
  • Privacy statement
  • Cookie Policy
  • Home
  • About
  • Posts
  • Blogs
    • B2022
    • The IP Blog
    • Public Law & Regulation
    • AI
    • The Unified Patents Court

LoupedIn

New EC guidance on “trustworthy” artificial intelligence

July 29, 2020, Gowling WLG

New EC guidance on “trustworthy” artificial intelligence

On 17 July 2020 the High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence (AI HLEG), the group of experts appointed by the European Commission to support the implementation of the European Strategy on Artificial Intelligence, presented the final Assessment List for Trustworthy AI (the List).

The concept of “trustworthy” AI was introduced by the AI HLEG in the Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence (Ethics Guidelines) and is based on seven key requirements:

  1. human agency and oversight;
  2. technical robustness and safety;
  3. privacy and data governance;
  4. transparency;
  5. diversity, non-discrimination and fairness;
  6. environmental and societal well-being; and
  7. accountability.

The List builds on these with guidance incorporating feedback received during a piloting phased in the second half of 2019. Importantly, the List has also been developed into a prototype web-based tool to guide developers and deployers of AI through the checklist. The List includes focused questions for organisations relating to each of the seven key requirements, with introductory sections offering guidance as to the importance and purpose of each one. While the List does not provide solutions to the questions posed, it offers a framework within which to consider how identified risks might be mitigated.

Prior to applying the List, a fundamental rights impact assessment is recommended to consider how the AI system might affect the rights granted under the Charter and the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), its protocols and the European Social Charter. Example questions provided include:

  • whether the AI system might negatively discriminate against people on the basis of, for example, sex, race, colour, ethnic or social origin;
  • whether the system protects personal data relating to individuals in line with GDPR;
  • whether the system respects the rights of the child; and
  • whether it respects other freedoms, such as the freedom of expression.

The List does not put in place mandatory requirements; it is intended to assist organisations in their understanding of trustworthy AI and in identifying risk areas specific to the sector or industry in which they operate.

The European Commission is currently in the process of developing regulatory proposals relating (in part) to trustworthy AI, following the completion of a public consultation process in response to its White Paper on Artificial Intelligence last month. These regulations may include aspects of the List and fundamental rights impact assessments. In the meantime, applying the recommendations of the AI HLEG should help companies align their use of AI with the regulatory framework being developed.

About the author(s)

Gowling WLG
See recent postsBlog biography

Gowling WLG is an international law firm operating across an array of different sectors and services. Our LoupedIn blog aims to give readers industry insight, technical knowledge and thoughtful observations on the legal landscape and beyond.

  • Gowling WLG
    South Asian Heritage Month: Sharing our stories, celebrating our roots
  • Gowling WLG
    Why good culture can’t wait: six things legal leaders can do now
  • Gowling WLG
    Ensuring the emerging geography of AI doesn’t become a TRAIN-wreck
  • Gowling WLG
    Celebrating Black History Month: Stories from our community
  • Gowling WLG
    No revocation carve-out and related actions – 2nd UPC decision on the merits
  • Gowling WLG
    The first UPC decision on the merits is here
  • Gowling WLG
    Milan goes live! 
  • Gowling WLG
    Celebrating Volunteers’ Week at Gowling WLG
  • Gowling WLG
    Gowling WLG at UKREiiF 2024
  • Gowling WLG
    The AI Act and IP
  • Gowling WLG
    The USPTO’s Guidance on AI-Assisted Inventions
  • Gowling WLG
    Gowling WLG at MIPIM 2024
  • Gowling WLG
    Text and data mining – A UK Update
  • Gowling WLG
    COP28 – The role of youth, education and skills in driving climate goals
  • Gowling WLG
    The US looks at AI and copyright
  • Gowling WLG
    The EU AI Act and IP
  • Gowling WLG
    London Tech Week 2023: Health tech and innovation
  • Gowling WLG
    Everything you always wanted to know about the UPC but were afraid to ask
  • Gowling WLG
    A new dawn for pharmaceutical legislation in Europe?
  • Gowling WLG
    Unified Patent Court to start on 1 June 2023 as Germany ratifies
  • Gowling WLG
    What I have learned from my solicitor apprenticeship
  • Gowling WLG
    Copyright in the outputs of generative AI
  • Gowling WLG
    AI and copyright in 2022
  • Gowling WLG
    AI patentability and sufficiency: new UK guidance
  • Gowling WLG
    Birmingham… the City of a Thousand Sounds
  • Gowling WLG
    Let’s Go Forward Bab
  • Gowling WLG
    What’s netball, eh?
  • Gowling WLG
    How am ya bab: welcoming the world for Birmingham’s finest hour
  • Gowling WLG
    Investigating self-driving safety – what about IP?
  • Gowling WLG
    Artificial Intelligence in France
  • Gowling WLG
    Artificial Intelligence in the UK
  • Gowling WLG
    EU-based manufacturers and distributors wise to consider PI strategies in light of CJEU’s judgment
  • Gowling WLG
    The UK’s National AI Strategy: governance, regulation and law
  • Gowling WLG
    Best practice for patenting AI
  • Gowling WLG
    The Birmingham 2022 Festival – A Celebration of Creativity Across the West Midlands
  • Gowling WLG
    Will the UPC ban UK patent attorneys from representing clients before it?
  • Gowling WLG
    Everything looks set for the Unified Patents Court to go ahead this year but…. Are we really out of the woods yet?
  • Gowling WLG
    Unified Patents Court – News Update
  • Gowling WLG
    What’s next? A digital transformation roadmap
  • Gowling WLG
    Copyright vs. “fake news” – Deletion of user contributions from a copyright point of view
  • Gowling WLG
    The new Copyright Service Provider Act in Germany
  • Gowling WLG
    Life as a secondee at the Birmingham 2022 Commonwealth Games
  • Gowling WLG
    COP26: Latest updates from the climate change conference
  • Gowling WLG
    Practicable tips for trade secret protection during litigation in Germany
  • Gowling WLG
    AI and IP – what is your strategy?
  • Gowling WLG
    ESG: 5 reasons HR plays a key role
  • Gowling WLG
    Stuart Russell on AI Regulation
  • Gowling WLG
    The Unified Patent Court’s Protocol on Privileges and Immunities comes into force
  • Gowling WLG
    AI Assurance
  • Gowling WLG
    Actuaries tackle the ethics of AI and data science
  • Gowling WLG
    Will the US drive greater IP protection for AI?
  • Gowling WLG
    New government support for UK FinTech
  • Gowling WLG
    Working at a law firm: My experience as a business development student
  • Gowling WLG
    In defence of the workplace
  • Gowling WLG
    Africa Investment Conference 2021 – key takeaways
  • Gowling WLG
    Patents in 2020 – The year in review
  • Gowling WLG
    The National Digital Twin Legal Implications
  • Gowling WLG
    Pension Schemes Act 2021 and increased regulatory powers
  • Gowling WLG
    Pension Schemes Act 2021 and statutory right to transfer
  • Gowling WLG
    UK House of Lords warns against complacency towards AI
  • Gowling WLG
    UK competition authority publishes research on harm by algorithm
  • Gowling WLG
    UKIPO patent guidance updated for DABUS judgment
  • Gowling WLG
    EU report on AI-assisted creativity and invention
  • Gowling WLG
    AI and trade: the view from Europe
  • Gowling WLG
    Legal training contracts: A trainee’s perspective
  • Gowling WLG
    UK CDEI publishes review of bias in algorithmic decision-making
  • Gowling WLG
    Apply for UK Government funding for robotic AI by 20 November 2020
  • Gowling WLG
    The UKIPO’s AI-powered trade mark tool enters beta testing
  • Gowling WLG
    New UK laws to curb illegal deforestation in supply chains
  • Gowling WLG
    New guidance on AI and data protection from the ICO
  • Gowling WLG
    A conversation on the future regulation of AI
  • Gowling WLG
    Guidelines for government procurement of AI in Canada
  • Gowling WLG
    Defining artificial intelligence
  • Gowling WLG
    WIPO’s revised paper on IP policy and AI
  • Gowling WLG
    The “Gee-Pay” – The Global Partnership on Artificial Intelligence
  • Gowling WLG
    The UK takes the temperature of AI opportunities, risks and governance
  • Gowling WLG
    UK guidance on explaining AI for GDPR compliance
  • Gowling WLG
    AI Procurement Toolkit published by the World Economic Forum
  • Gowling WLG
    The Law Commission’s second consultation on autonomous vehicles
  • Gowling WLG
    Could standards for Artificial General Intelligence save humanity?
  • Gowling WLG
    Artificial intelligence in healthcare: NHSX AI Lab publishes a buyer’s checklist
  • Gowling WLG
    How should we regulate online targeting?
  • Gowling WLG
    AI in aviation: regulating autonomous flights
  • Gowling WLG
    The UKIPO launches AI-powered assessments of trademark applications
  • Gowling WLG
    The UKIPO investigates AI-powered prior art searches
  • Gowling WLG
    USPTO denies patent application for invention by AI
  • Gowling WLG
    We need to talk about whistleblowing
  • Gowling WLG
    What is the Customs Union?
  • Gowling WLG
    Autonomous vehicles: are ethical guidelines needed?
  • Gowling WLG
    5G: How will businesses benefit?
  • Gowling WLG
    Using blockchain in advertising
  • Gowling WLG
    What digital infrastructure is needed for connected and autonomous vehicles (CAVS)?
  • Gowling WLG
    Protecting designs for multigenerational living
  • Gowling WLG
    Five ways the Internet has changed business
  • Gowling WLG
    Protectionism and tech’s raw materials
  • Gowling WLG
    Mental health at work: How to support your employees
  • Gowling WLG
    Electric vehicles (EVs): What are the indirect effects?
  • Gowling WLG
    Urban mobility: planning for the future
  • Gowling WLG
    What are the risks associated with driverless cars?
  • Gowling WLG
    What are a business’ digital risks?
  • Gowling WLG
    How will infrastructure need to change for connected and autonomous vehicles (CAVs)?
  • Gowling WLG
    Current office space trends
  • Gowling WLG
    Drafting leasing agreements for tenants in the life sciences sector
  • Gowling WLG
    How does tax work in the UK?
  • Gowling WLG
    How 3D printing is bringing modern housing to life
  • Gowling WLG
    Using blockchain for land registry
  • Gowling WLG
    What are the risks and benefits of cloud services?
  • Gowling WLG
    A guide to doing business in the UK
  • Gowling WLG
    Using discretionary powers as a pension trustee
  • Gowling WLG
    How to avoid copyright infringement online
  • Gowling WLG
    How will the UK plastic ban affect the food and drink industry?
  • Gowling WLG
    A guide to how patent law works
  • Gowling WLG
    Jaguar: the heart of UK Automotive
  • Gowling WLG
    Employees, Corporate Governance and a Grand Day Out

Filed Under: AI, Opinion Tagged With: Artificial Intelligence (AI), European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR)

Views expressed in this blog do not necessarily reflect those of Gowling WLG.

NOT LEGAL ADVICE. Information made available on this website in any form is for information purposes only. It is not, and should not be taken as, legal advice. You should not rely on, or take or fail to take any action based upon this information. Never disregard professional legal advice or delay in seeking legal advice because of something you have read on this website. Gowling WLG professionals will be pleased to discuss resolutions to specific legal concerns you may have.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • CJEU on Attribution of Voting Rights: “Acting in concert in another manner” under Section 34(2) WpHG contrary to EU law
  • On the right track: how rail is putting customers first
  • Reflections from the Pharma & Biotech Patent Litigation Europe Summit

Tags

Artificial Intelligence (AI) (65) Autonomous vehicles (11) b2022 (19) Birmingham 2022 (8) Birmingham 2022 Commonwealth Games (15) Brexit (23) Climate change (18) Collective defined contribution (6) COP26 (11) Copyright (11) COVID-19 (23) Cyber security (7) Data protection (8) Defined contribution (7) Dispute Resolution (15) Employment (15) employment law (14) Environment (19) Environmental Societal Governance (9) ESG (56) ESG and pensions (13) General Election 2024 and pensions (8) Intellectual Property (90) IP (12) Life sciences (9) litigation funding (9) net zero (6) Patents (41) Pensions (54) Pension Schemes Act 2021 (11) Pensions dashboards (7) Pensions in 2022 (10) Pensions law (45) Procurement (7) Public Law & Regulation (39) Real Estate (28) Retail (8) sustainability (22) Tech (58) The Week In Pensions (11) Trademarks (16) UK (15) unified patents court (9) UPC (40) Week in HR (8)

Categories

Archives

Gowling WLG is an international law firm comprising the members of Gowling WLG International Limited, an English Company Limited by Guarantee, and their respective affiliates. Each member and affiliate is an autonomous and independent entity. Gowling WLG International Limited promotes, facilitates and co-ordinates the activities of its members but does not itself provide services to clients. Our structure is explained in more detail on our Legal Information page.

Footer

  • Home
  • About
  • Gowling WLG
  • Legal information
  • Privacy statement
  • Cookie Policy

© 2026 Gowling WLG