• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
  • Gowling WLG
  • Legal information
  • Privacy statement
  • Cookie Policy
  • Home
  • About
  • Posts
  • Blogs
    • B2022
    • The IP Blog
    • Public Law & Regulation
    • AI
    • The Unified Patents Court

LoupedIn

New EC guidance on “trustworthy” artificial intelligence

July 29, 2020, Gowling WLG

New EC guidance on “trustworthy” artificial intelligence

On 17 July 2020 the High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence (AI HLEG), the group of experts appointed by the European Commission to support the implementation of the European Strategy on Artificial Intelligence, presented the final Assessment List for Trustworthy AI (the List).

The concept of “trustworthy” AI was introduced by the AI HLEG in the Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence (Ethics Guidelines) and is based on seven key requirements:

  1. human agency and oversight;
  2. technical robustness and safety;
  3. privacy and data governance;
  4. transparency;
  5. diversity, non-discrimination and fairness;
  6. environmental and societal well-being; and
  7. accountability.

The List builds on these with guidance incorporating feedback received during a piloting phased in the second half of 2019. Importantly, the List has also been developed into a prototype web-based tool to guide developers and deployers of AI through the checklist. The List includes focused questions for organisations relating to each of the seven key requirements, with introductory sections offering guidance as to the importance and purpose of each one. While the List does not provide solutions to the questions posed, it offers a framework within which to consider how identified risks might be mitigated.

Prior to applying the List, a fundamental rights impact assessment is recommended to consider how the AI system might affect the rights granted under the Charter and the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), its protocols and the European Social Charter. Example questions provided include:

  • whether the AI system might negatively discriminate against people on the basis of, for example, sex, race, colour, ethnic or social origin;
  • whether the system protects personal data relating to individuals in line with GDPR;
  • whether the system respects the rights of the child; and
  • whether it respects other freedoms, such as the freedom of expression.

The List does not put in place mandatory requirements; it is intended to assist organisations in their understanding of trustworthy AI and in identifying risk areas specific to the sector or industry in which they operate.

The European Commission is currently in the process of developing regulatory proposals relating (in part) to trustworthy AI, following the completion of a public consultation process in response to its White Paper on Artificial Intelligence last month. These regulations may include aspects of the List and fundamental rights impact assessments. In the meantime, applying the recommendations of the AI HLEG should help companies align their use of AI with the regulatory framework being developed.

About the author(s)

Gowling WLG
See recent postsBlog biography

Gowling WLG is an international law firm operating across an array of different sectors and services. Our LoupedIn blog aims to give readers industry insight, technical knowledge and thoughtful observations on the legal landscape and beyond.

  • Gowling WLG
    https://loupedin.blog/author/gowlingwlg/
    Ensuring the emerging geography of AI doesn’t become a TRAIN-wreck
  • Gowling WLG
    https://loupedin.blog/author/gowlingwlg/
    Celebrating Black History Month: Stories from our community
  • Gowling WLG
    https://loupedin.blog/author/gowlingwlg/
    No revocation carve-out and related actions – 2nd UPC decision on the merits
  • Gowling WLG
    https://loupedin.blog/author/gowlingwlg/
    The first UPC decision on the merits is here

Filed Under: AI, Opinion Tagged With: Artificial Intelligence (AI), European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR)

Views expressed in this blog do not necessarily reflect those of Gowling WLG.

NOT LEGAL ADVICE. Information made available on this website in any form is for information purposes only. It is not, and should not be taken as, legal advice. You should not rely on, or take or fail to take any action based upon this information. Never disregard professional legal advice or delay in seeking legal advice because of something you have read on this website. Gowling WLG professionals will be pleased to discuss resolutions to specific legal concerns you may have.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Sole(ly) aesthetic? The Birkenstock Sandal goes to the Federal Court of Justice
  • UK Litigation Funding: reform or retain?
  • Arbitration Act 2025 receives Royal Assent

Tags

Artificial Intelligence (AI) (62) Autonomous vehicles (11) b2022 (19) Birmingham 2022 (8) Birmingham 2022 Commonwealth Games (15) Brexit (23) Climate change (16) Collective defined contribution (6) COP26 (11) Copyright (11) COVID-19 (23) Cyber security (7) Data protection (8) Defined contribution (7) Dispute Resolution (14) Employment (14) employment law (11) Environment (18) Environmental Societal Governance (9) ESG (50) ESG and pensions (11) General Election 2024 and pensions (8) Intellectual Property (86) IP (10) Life sciences (7) litigation funding (8) net zero (6) Patents (40) Pensions (53) Pension Schemes Act 2021 (11) Pensions dashboards (7) Pensions in 2022 (10) Pensions law (43) Procurement (7) Public Law & Regulation (39) Real Estate (27) Retail (8) sustainability (21) Tech (58) The Week In Pensions (11) Trademarks (16) UK (15) unified patents court (9) UPC (39) Week in HR (8)

Categories

Archives

Gowling WLG is an international law firm comprising the members of Gowling WLG International Limited, an English Company Limited by Guarantee, and their respective affiliates. Each member and affiliate is an autonomous and independent entity. Gowling WLG International Limited promotes, facilitates and co-ordinates the activities of its members but does not itself provide services to clients. Our structure is explained in more detail on our Legal Information page.

Footer

  • Home
  • About
  • Gowling WLG
  • Legal information
  • Privacy statement
  • Cookie Policy

© 2025 Gowling WLG