• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
  • Gowling WLG
  • Legal information
  • Privacy statement
  • Cookie Policy
  • Home
  • About
  • Posts
  • Blogs
    • B2022
    • The IP Blog
    • Public Law & Regulation
    • AI
    • The Unified Patents Court

LoupedIn

The Week In Pensions – Court of Appeal rejects state pension age claim

September 23, 2020, Ian Chapman-Curry

The Week In Pensions – Court of Appeal rejects state pension age claim

The Week In Pensions provides you with a digest of the most important developments in pensions law and regulation along with highlighting some of the most interesting stories from the pensions industry and national press.

In The Week In Pensions this week:

  • The Court of Appeal rejects state pension age challenge;
  • FCA issues its Financial Services Regulatory Grid;
  • TPR confirms consultation on consolidated TKU code;
  • Pensions Minister expresses confidence in passing of the Pension Schemes Bill 2019 – 21 by the end of the year;
  • TPR confirms contribution payment failure period to return to 90 days in 2021; and
  • Regulations to correct defect in PPF creditor rights regulations published.

And, in the pensions industry and national press:

  • Fraction of pension scams investigated by police; and
  • Pension transfer advice in short supply just as demand for transfers increases.

Watch our pensions law video update

Pensions law and regulation update

Court of Appeal rejects state pension age challenge

The case involves the “BackTo60” campaign challenging the equalisation of the state pension age for women from 60 to 65 and the further raising of the state pension age for both men and women from 65 to 66, 67 and 68 (depending on age) on the grounds of direct and indirect age and gender discrimination. The women also argued they had not been given sufficient notice of the planned changes. While expressing sympathy for the women, the Court of Appeal upheld the Divisional Court decision that there had been no discrimination, ruling that the government’s changes equalising and then raising the state pension age was not manifestly without reasonable foundation (in terms of striking the balance between the public purse and hardship to the affected women).

The Court also agreed with the Divisional Court that the government’s publicity campaign over a number of years had been adequate and reasonable notification of the changes if indeed notice was required (which was not established as there was no duty to notify in the legislation and it was not for the courts to introduce notification or consultation requirements not otherwise provided for by Parliament). Although the women had been given an extension of time to bring their case, relief could also still be refused on the ground of undue delay, in any event. BackTo60 is considering an appeal.

More information

  • Click here for the full text of The Queen on the application of (1) Julie Delve and (2) Karen Glynn v The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2020] EWCA Civ 1199 

FCA issues Financial Services Regulatory Initiatives Grid

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has joined forces with a variety of regulatory bodies including The Pensions Regulator (TPR) to establish the Financial Services Regulatory Initiatives Forum (Forum) and set out in one place information about their various ongoing regulatory initiatives that may have significant operational impact over a 24 month period.

The Regulatory Initiatives Grid (Grid), first introduced in May, is intended to help organisations plan for change and is updated by the FCA regularly and at least twice a year. There are currently 111 initiatives, some of which are paused and others are long-running.

The Grid is 25 pages long and a useful tool to view initiatives across the regulatory spectrum, from the prospective review by Her Majesty’s Treasury (HMT) of Solvency II and the FCA/HMT initiatives implementing the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (REFIT), to the more familiar initiatives by TPR such as in relation to DB scheme funding.

More information

  • Click here for the a PDF copy of the FCA’s Grid.

The Pensions Regulator to consult on consolidated TKU code by November 2020

Fiona Frobisher, Head of Policy at the Pensions Regulator (TPR), has confirmed that TPR is expected to launch a consultation on the standards of its consolidated trustee knowledge and understanding (TKU) codes by November 2020.

Speaking at the Pensions Age Annual Conference, Frobisher stated that TPR would be seeking views from the pensions industry on how to make the rewritten codes “better and clearer for everybody”, after adding greater governance requirements and focus on environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues. Currently, the TPR has consolidated between 50 to 70 modules into ten codes for easier access.

Pensions Minister expresses confidence in passing of Pension Schemes Bill 2019-21 by end of 2020

The Pensions Minister, Guy Opperman, has stated that he is confident the Pension Schemes Bill 2019-21 will “be in law by the end of the year”. Mr Opperman was speaking at a webinar hosted by the Society of Pension Professionals, where he explained that COVID-19 and Brexit-related matters were of top priority for Parliament.

TPR confirms contribution payment failure period to return to 90 days in 2021

TPR has updated its ‘COVID-19: an update on reporting duties and enforcement activity guidance’ to confirm that, with effect from 1 January 2021, it will require pension scheme providers and trustees to revert to reporting payment failures that are 90 days outstanding, rather than 150 days as is currently provided under an easement.

TPR acknowledges that this reduction in the reporting timetable may have an impact on providers’ systems and processes. Because of this it is providing a three-month period for schemes to make the necessary adjustments. However, the 90-day period will become mandatory from 1 April 2021.

More information

  • Click here for TPR’s ‘Late payment reporting: COVID-19 information for providers’.

Regulations to correct defect in PPF creditor rights regulations published

The Pension Protection Fund (Moratorium and Arrangements and Reconstructions for Companies in Financial Difficulty) (Amendment and Revocation) Regulations 2020 (SI 2020/990) have been laid before Parliament on 15 September 2020.

These Regulations correct a “procedural error” that occurred when the earlier Pension Protection Fund (Moratorium and Arrangements and Reconstructions for Companies in Financial Difficulty) (Amendment) Regulations 2020 (SI 2020/783) were brought into force.

The new regulations came into force on 16 September 2020 and revoke and replace the earlier regulations. The Regulations aim to extend the scope of creditor rights exercisable by the PPF in certain circumstances for purposes of the Corporate Governance and Insolvency Act 2020.

Highlights from the pensions industry and national press

Fraction of pension scams investigated by police

Following a freedom of information request, wealth managers Quilter have found that just 7% of reported pension scams were passed on for police investigation last year. The figures released under the freedom of information request showed that in 2019 nearly 400 pension fraud reports were submitted to Action Fraud, but only 26 were handed to the police. It is unclear how many of these resulted in the police taking any action.

More information

  • Click here for the full story from Pensions Expert.

Pension transfer advice in short supply just as demand for transfers increases

Three years ago, there were roughly 3,000 specialist transfer advisers operating in the UK market. Today, this has shrunk to 1,000. This is creating difficulties for members wishing to transfer safeguarded defined benefits into flexible defined contribution arrangements. Specialist financial advice is required for any such transfers if the transfer value is more than £30,000.

The problem is exacerbated as demand has increased at the same time as the supply of advisers has decreased. Many defined benefit schemes and pensions industry advisers are reporting a material spike in requests from DB members to transfer to flexible DC arrangements. Many in the industry expect this trend to accelerate with increasing numbers of redundancies and higher levels of unemployment as a result of COVID-19 restrictions.

More information

  • Click here for the full story from the Financial Times.

Get more Insights from the pensions team

Gowling WLG has one of the UK’s largest and most experienced pensions law teams. As well as publishing The Week In Pensions, the team issues The Month In Pensions podcast and agenda and regular Insights on key legal developments.

  • Click here for the latest Insights from the pensions team at Gowling WLG; and
  • Click here to find out more about the pensions team at Gowling WLG.

About the author(s)

Photo of Ian Chapman-Curry
Ian Chapman-Curry
See recent postsBlog biography

Ian is a London-based professional support lawyer (PSL) legal director. Ian is a member of our pensions and combined human resource solutions (CHRS) teams. He works with clients to solve their employment and pensions law issues. Ian maintains a particular focus on 'crossover' issues that benefit from his understanding of both areas of law.

  • Ian Chapman-Curry
    https://loupedin.blog/author/ianchapmancurry/
    CDC – how does the proposed multi-employer regime differ from the single employer regulations?
  • Ian Chapman-Curry
    https://loupedin.blog/author/ianchapmancurry/
    CDC – the next stage in the evolution of CDC
  • Ian Chapman-Curry
    https://loupedin.blog/author/ianchapmancurry/
    CDC – a brave new world for the UK’s pensions industry?
  • Ian Chapman-Curry
    https://loupedin.blog/author/ianchapmancurry/
    The King’s Speech and the Pension Schemes Bill

Ian Chapman-Curry

Ian is a London-based professional support lawyer (PSL) legal director. Ian is a member of our pensions and combined human resource solutions (CHRS) teams. He works with clients to solve their employment and pensions law issues. Ian maintains a particular focus on 'crossover' issues that benefit from his understanding of both areas of law.

Filed Under: News Tagged With: Pensions, Pensions law, The Week In Pensions

Views expressed in this blog do not necessarily reflect those of Gowling WLG.

NOT LEGAL ADVICE. Information made available on this website in any form is for information purposes only. It is not, and should not be taken as, legal advice. You should not rely on, or take or fail to take any action based upon this information. Never disregard professional legal advice or delay in seeking legal advice because of something you have read on this website. Gowling WLG professionals will be pleased to discuss resolutions to specific legal concerns you may have.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • UPC’s first decision concerning a second medical use patent
  • Sole(ly) aesthetic? The Birkenstock Sandal goes to the Federal Court of Justice
  • UK Litigation Funding: reform or retain?

Tags

Artificial Intelligence (AI) (62) Autonomous vehicles (11) b2022 (19) Birmingham 2022 (8) Birmingham 2022 Commonwealth Games (15) Brexit (23) Climate change (16) Collective defined contribution (6) COP26 (11) Copyright (11) COVID-19 (23) Cyber security (7) Data protection (8) Defined contribution (7) Dispute Resolution (14) Employment (14) employment law (11) Environment (18) Environmental Societal Governance (9) ESG (50) ESG and pensions (11) General Election 2024 and pensions (8) Intellectual Property (87) IP (10) Life sciences (7) litigation funding (8) net zero (6) Patents (41) Pensions (53) Pension Schemes Act 2021 (11) Pensions dashboards (7) Pensions in 2022 (10) Pensions law (43) Procurement (7) Public Law & Regulation (39) Real Estate (27) Retail (8) sustainability (21) Tech (58) The Week In Pensions (11) Trademarks (16) UK (15) unified patents court (9) UPC (40) Week in HR (8)

Categories

Archives

Gowling WLG is an international law firm comprising the members of Gowling WLG International Limited, an English Company Limited by Guarantee, and their respective affiliates. Each member and affiliate is an autonomous and independent entity. Gowling WLG International Limited promotes, facilitates and co-ordinates the activities of its members but does not itself provide services to clients. Our structure is explained in more detail on our Legal Information page.

Footer

  • Home
  • About
  • Gowling WLG
  • Legal information
  • Privacy statement
  • Cookie Policy

© 2025 Gowling WLG